Why do you people insist on getting your panties into a twist over this? Panties are SO MUCH MORE comfortable when worn correctly.
But the pilot could of shot and missed, standing there talking was moronic.
And you can't be heroes if the people your beating up are not a viable threat, beating up people who can't fight back effectively is called bullying.
Seriously, who just shoots someone because they've ran up to you?
To me these guys seem like they are a bunch of bullies, used to people being compliant and scared and not really coming up against any resistance.
I doubt it's the empires policy to just shoot people because they've bashed 2 troopers heads together? They obviously would want to arrest him not gun him down, and when you are pointing a gun at someone you tend to think they are going to do what you tell them, when they don't and you aren't willing to pull the trigger you are left with little options, especially against a guy that is clearly very physically strong and well trained with his shiny stick.
Regardless of all that there's absolutely no need to justify it in a kids show, they aren't going to have him gunned down.
*sigh* after he was knocked over and picked up the blaster was when he should of shot the violent criminal, he had reasonable cause.
And those two troopers were arresting a criminal for selling deathsticks to younglings, your hero ensured he'd carry on doing that and six months from then a bad batch kills 1400.
Or does the fact he's a wise cracking bad ass excuse attacking honest people just doing their jobs, you have no proof any of those soldiers ever did anything worth getting attacked for.
Yes, Luke killed 100,000 + people in the Deathstar attack. Yes, Han Solo was most probably involved in the drugs trade. GET OVER IT. The OT was heavily inspired by WW2 - think of the death star attack as synonymous with Hiroshima. Massive casualties, but necessary. (Except the star wars version is actually LESS morally difficult, as I doubt there were children on the Death Star).
And in regards to the tired "average joe stormtrooper" argument: Even if you do not personally take part in the atrocities committed by your government, you still share responsibility if by your actions you aid their continued evil, instead of resisting it. Google Adolf Eichmann.
So because some American soldiers comit war crimes that makes all of the armed forces guilty?
You sure you want that to be your line of argument.
Non sequitur.
There is a huge difference between a single rogue individual within an organisation committing crimes and a single individual choosing to turn a blind eye to the evil done by the organisation it is aligned with.