Forgot Setback for Inaccurate:
forgot a die
:
1eS
1 failure
11 damage.
You hit him pretty solidly, and half-melted credits spill out of the blaster hole in his trench coat. It appears his "armor" is made up of ill-gotten gains.
Falmok will move closer.. (no actions, since Cade and Ge'tal are probably in the way)
6 minutes ago, RuusMarev said:Falmok will move closer.. (no actions, since Cade and Ge'tal are probably in the way)
Any ranged attacks would be upgraded once.
You moving into cover?
5 minutes ago, P-47 Thunderbolt said:Any ranged attacks would be upgraded once.
You moving into cover?
that sounds ominous..
(how many places or offices could people hide if the Barabel brought friends?)
Just now, RuusMarev said:that sounds ominous..
(how many places or offices could people hide if the Barabel brought friends?)
It's a small place. Two offices on the right, and a door into the rear is behind the desk. Darien and Maya saw no potential associates.
As for sounding ominous, I'm just checking if you're taking cover since you aren't taking an action. If the Barabel were to target Falmok (unlikely), it would become relevant.
@RuusMarev , once you've posted IC for Falmok, Ge'tal is up.
@Tramp Graphics , attacking the Barabel is Average with 2 Setback and a Boost.
Melee
:
3eP+1eB+2eD+2eS
1 success, 1 advantage
That’s 8 damage, and I activate Sunder once, damaging his weapon one step.
3 minutes ago, Tramp Graphics said:Melee : 3eP+1eB+2eD+2eS 1 success, 1 advantage
That’s 8 damage, and I activate Sunder once, damaging his weapon one step.
9, actually, because I messed up the Setback. It should have only been one, so we drop that second one.
Please go ahead and post IC.
Oops, that Setback
was
supposed to apply since he'd taken Guarded Stance. Okay, one damage less then. Good grief.
Kazuk:
Maneuver: Aim
Action: Shoot at Ge'tal:
Shooting at Ge'tal
:
1eP+2eA+1eB+3eD+2eS
1 failure
You ward off his attack.
@RuusMarev , you're up for Kara, Cade, and Falmok.
Any ranged attacks are Easy, upgraded once, with 2 Setback. Melee attacks are Average with a single Setback.
1 hour ago, P-47 Thunderbolt said:Oops, that Setback was supposed to apply since he'd taken Guarded Stance. Okay, one damage less then. Good grief.
Kazuk:
Maneuver: Aim
Action: Shoot at Ge'tal: Shooting at Ge'tal : 1eP+2eA+1eB+3eD+2eS 1 failure
You ward off his attack.
@RuusMarev , you're up for Kara, Cade, and Falmok.
Any ranged attacks are Easy, upgraded once, with 2 Setback. Melee attacks are Average with a single Setback.
You might want to edit your IC post. Ge’tal is left handed and is wielding her Beskad in that hand. She has her blaster in her right as backup.
Just now, Tramp Graphics said:You might want to edit your IC post. Ge’tal is left handed and is wielding her Beskad in that hand. She has her blaster in her right as backup.
Okay.
In the future, please specify what you are carrying into combat. I was under the impression you were carrying nothing, and then drew your beskad for that last attack. You don't generally list what Maneuvers you take, which can make things confusing. It also makes it harder for me to recommend narrative interpretations based on the roll. Speaking of narrative interpretations, you didn't kick the Barabel in the face, because you didn't have an effect that would make sense for that.
1 minute ago, P-47 Thunderbolt said:Okay.
In the future, please specify what you are carrying into combat. I was under the impression you were carrying nothing, and then drew your beskad for that last attack. You don't generally list what Maneuvers you take, which can make things confusing. It also makes it harder for me to recommend narrative interpretations based on the roll. Speaking of narrative interpretations, you didn't kick the Barabel in the face, because you didn't have an effect that would make sense for that.
I did. In my first post of the combat I said that I drew my weapons.
Just now, Tramp Graphics said:I did. In my first post of the combat I said that I drew my weapons.
Okay, then I missed that.
Just now, P-47 Thunderbolt said:Okay, then I missed that.
No problem 😎
Kara v Barabel (Accurate 1, AIM) STUN carbine
:
1eA+2eP+2eB+1eC+2eS
6 successes, 2 threat
Just now, RuusMarev said:Kara v Barabel (Accurate 1, AIM) STUN carbine : 1eA+2eP+2eB+1eC+2eS 6 successes, 2 threat
HOLY HANNAH!
He's still up, but only barely. Take 2 Strain as the stun energy bleeds into Kara a little.
3 minutes ago, P-47 Thunderbolt said:HOLY HANNAH!
He's still up, but only barely. Take 2 Strain as the stun energy bleeds into Kara a little.
uhoh... 13/13
Just now, RuusMarev said:uhoh... 13/13
You're lucky you recovered that strain earlier.
i know, right?
@RuusMarev
,
ch
airs not
st
airs.
Cade Blastknucles of fury vs Barabel (frenzy x2) inaccurate
:
4eP+2eD+2eS
4 successes, 3 threat
threat= 3 more strain on top of Frenzy?
Just now, RuusMarev said:Cade Blastknucles of fury vs Barabel (frenzy x2) inaccurate : 4eP+2eD+2eS 4 successes, 3 threat
threat= 3 more strain on top of Frenzy?
You actually suffer 1 Strain each time you use Blast Knuckles (don't know if you've been recording that). So you should have taken 2 Strain already, aside from Threat.
And yes, the Barabel is very down now. With the Threat, I'll posit that the Barabel is dead, no saving him.
1 minute ago, P-47 Thunderbolt said:You actually suffer 1 Strain each time you use Blast Knuckles (don't know if you've been recording that). So you should have taken 2 Strain already, aside from Threat.
And yes, the Barabel is very down now. With the Threat, I'll posit that the Barabel is dead, no saving him.
oops....
Upon searching the corpse, he's got 35,700 in unmelted credits concealed in his trench coat (the smuggling sort). That's 5,100 credits each when split seven ways. (It's less than the original 60k because the pair had some expenses)
Aside from his carbine, all he had was a long knife and the credits.
sigh.. I guess it's better than nothing... Take it all, carbine, knife and credits... ( any way of salvaging the damaged credits?)