3 minutes ago, Do I need a Username said:

behind you

*teleports behind u*

In regards to the over/under on the amount of lists that were flown in a tight formation that clearly weren't supposed to, it was set at 10 for GSC. After a lot of hammering the over, what did it actually look like? Was it closer to over or under 10? I need to set the new line on that for Coruscant.

5 minutes ago, RStan said:

In regards to the over/under on the amount of lists that were flown in a tight formation that clearly weren't supposed to, it was set at 10 for GSC. After a lot of hammering the over, what did it actually look like? Was it closer to over or under 10? I need to set the new line on that for Coruscant.

Hammer the over. How many of them qualified with 2 ship lists that flew in formation or three ships lists that flew in formation?

12 minutes ago, RStan said:

In regards to the over/under on the amount of lists that were flown in a tight formation that clearly weren't supposed to, it was set at 10 for GSC. After a lot of hammering the over, what did it actually look like? Was it closer to over or under 10? I need to set the new line on that for Coruscant.

I don't think we have any way of measuring it, haha

Just now, Brunas said:

I don't think we have any way of measuring it, haha

I knew that lol, it's more of a did it look like 10 + or -. I didn't make it to GSC otherwise I would've went around and tried to record it. Maybe I'll do that for Crossroads...

We wanted to measure it, but that's a lot of work for dion.

We need to stick to clearly measurable and verifiable things that are checked at the end.

But man I still wanted that information.

18 hours ago, Brunas said:

Diomedes

IT IS THE BANEBLADE

30 minutes ago, Tlfj200 said:

We wanted to measure it, but that's a lot of work for dion.

We need to stick to clearly measurable and verifiable things that are checked at the end.

But man I still wanted that information.

Just get all his $20,000 dollars worth of patreons to email him asking for it.

Or ask him to apportion half the time he spends shilling for ca$h doing the analysis and it'll be done in no time

Is anyone else having a ton of fun with Imperial 4 ship lists?

So many combinations to just throw together to see if it works.

The archetype feels reasonably ok if you protect whatever end game ace is included.

Now I sort of wish there was a decent MechWarrior Miniatures game.

1 minute ago, Scott Pilgrim2 said:

Now I sort of wish there was a decent MechWarrior Miniatures game.

Triggered....

2 minutes ago, Scott Pilgrim2 said:

Now I sort of wish there was a decent MechWarrior Miniatures game.

But....I mean.....its called....uh..

Hmmmm.

For the record, I don't know if there is a game, good or bad. I don't need to seek out ways to spend more money on miniatures.

1 minute ago, Scott Pilgrim2 said:

For the record, I don't know if there is a game, good or bad. I don't need to seek out ways to spend more money on miniatures.

For the record, there is. It's some 30 years old now, and still going. You're looking for what's called "Classic Battletech" which is what the MechWarrior franchise originated from.

6 minutes ago, LagJanson said:

For the record, there is. It's some 30 years old now, and still going. You're looking for what's called "Classic Battletech" which is what the MechWarrior franchise originated from.

I did a quick google search - man that looks cool. I loved playing the MechWarrior games and this would be my go to universe for land based combat. I'll have to drool over the models the next time I am in the game store.

1 hour ago, Boom Owl said:

Is anyone else having a ton of fun with Imperial 4 ship lists?

So many combinations to just throw together to see if it works.

The archetype feels reasonably ok if you protect whatever end game ace is included.

I keep putting together 3 ship ace lists and then realizing that in 2.0 I need some beef/bait and swapping one of them for 2 strikers thus ending with a 4 ship list.

Or Redline. That ship reliably gets 2 proton bombs and an APT off while soaking up 2 turns worth of fire, well worth the points as a massive distraction that you can't afford to ignore

5 minutes ago, Makaze said:

massive distraction that you can't afford to ignore

Punisher =

It does feel like the Imperial four ace list is a lot more diverse and reasonable than Rebel four ace. The Imperial ships just slide in so nicely and don't rely on anything.

59 minutes ago, LagJanson said:

It does feel like the Imperial four ace list is a lot more diverse and reasonable than Rebel four ace. The Imperial ships just slide in so nicely and don't rely on anything.

With Rebels it seems like ships are oddly costed enough where the 4 ships seem too lean, but then you go to 3 ships and you start to overspend points on upgrades. Rebels feel like there is a list building puzzle there to unpack - though I imagine once the correct 4 ship rebel list is discovered people will complain again. My instinct is that Debris Gambit Sabine is at least part of that 4-some.

Unless the answer is 4 barrage rocket K-wings with 3 proton bombs.

Having Dion and the Krayts is something I never knew I wanted. Now that's all I want.

All I see is a tiny *****.

1 minute ago, delrustymar said:

Having Dion and the Krayts is something I never knew I wanted. Now that's all I want.

I see me in there!

1 minute ago, Scott Pilgrim2 said:

All I see is a tiny *****.

Hey! It's average, those are just some really big ol listener pools...

1 hour ago, Boom Owl said:

Punisher =

why is this gnome whacking it in the cockpit before he turns around?