I hope the bounty-hunters show up as antagonists in a future season, but the next big bad after Thrawn? no idea. Maybe Jabba?Imagine two more seasons of Thrawn letting them escape...Could Thrawn's trap take place during Rouge one?
"Let them go...for now!" Mwahahahaha
I'd pull my hair out
This was really the problem with dumping Vader in right at season 2 - it was too soon to introduce that character.
I mean, I get why they did it in reality - ratings purposes, James Earl Jones still alive and doing voiceovers for other Star Wars material at that very moment (Rogue One) so it'd be easy enough to give him a handful of lines for 'Rebels', etc...
But from a story perspective...way too early to spring that villain on the Rebels. I mean, where do you even go from there? Thrawn is an interesting choice, but more a sidestep from Vader than a greater threat. Will they be facing the Emperor himself in season 5??
I dunno - for a show that REALLY NEEDED to have an over-arching story, it comes of feeling most of the time like they are 'shooting from the hip', as it were...
But are 'the bounty hunters' really a bigger threat than the Inquisitor? Arguably. Thrawn? Well, no. DARTH FREAKING VADER? Good grief, no!
Which was the complaint - springing VADER, of all things, on the Rebels really painted the writers into a corner. Short of the Emperor, himself, you just aren't going to get a higher-level villain opposing them. (I guess, arguably, Tarkin might qualify...but that's on a technicality, and we know he has to survive and still be in the Emperor's favor by Episode IV)
Who is the bigger threat? Heracles or Alexander? ;-)




