I hope the bounty-hunters show up as antagonists in a future season, but the next big bad after Thrawn? no idea. Maybe Jabba?Imagine two more seasons of Thrawn letting them escape...Could Thrawn's trap take place during Rouge one?
![]()
"Let them go...for now!" Mwahahahaha
I'd pull my hair out
This was really the problem with dumping Vader in right at season 2 - it was too soon to introduce that character.
I mean, I get why they did it in reality - ratings purposes, James Earl Jones still alive and doing voiceovers for other Star Wars material at that very moment (Rogue One) so it'd be easy enough to give him a handful of lines for 'Rebels', etc...
But from a story perspective...way too early to spring that villain on the Rebels. I mean, where do you even go from there? Thrawn is an interesting choice, but more a sidestep from Vader than a greater threat. Will they be facing the Emperor himself in season 5??
I dunno - for a show that REALLY NEEDED to have an over-arching story, it comes of feeling most of the time like they are 'shooting from the hip', as it were...
But are 'the bounty hunters' really a bigger threat than the Inquisitor? Arguably. Thrawn? Well, no. DARTH FREAKING VADER? Good grief , no!
Which was the complaint - springing VADER, of all things, on the Rebels really painted the writers into a corner. Short of the Emperor, himself, you just aren't going to get a higher-level villain opposing them. (I guess, arguably, Tarkin might qualify...but that's on a technicality, and we know he has to survive and still be in the Emperor's favor by Episode IV)
Who is the bigger threat? Heracles or Alexander? ;-)