On 1/7/2019 at 3:32 AM, TheCallum said:

At this point I’m still game for pushing a vote until someone gets scared and giving more info, otherwise we aren’t getting anywhere.

##vote @Traingirl1

This is a town move. Although Traingirl does reply a little later and Cal makes no comment on it. Pressure is good, but without follow up its less so. If her answer left you thinking she was still scum, then it needs to be attacked, picked apart and exposed. If its enough that shes not in your crosshairs anymore, then we go somewhere else.

And privately, you may well have, but the rest of us have no indication of that.

17 hours ago, EbonHawk said:

Not sure if callum understands what a policy lynch is?

I mean, he’s ostensibly pushing for one by pushing inactives.

16 hours ago, TheCallum said:

my voting is just based on who is being the quietest, to try and either remove a non-player, or get more information for the town. There is no other explanation. Every time I've targeted someone they've come on and posted. That's information gain.

I did a quick relook and started at pg 8, it looked like you target traingirl. One action doesn’t constitute a pattern. Also, aside from the fact that she posted, and we learned she was having some growing pains transitioning to the forum.

15 hours ago, TheCallum said:

Haha it’s all completely secondary to lynch votes. We need to get a few people on the noose.

Ideally, we’d also like to murder the right people.

I’m still kinda neutral on Cal, but I suppose I see the appeal if we’re buying that Clon didn’t lie with makicious intent.

3 minutes ago, markdedrick said:

OK, joining this morning and glad there was at least some activity overnight. I very much think we do need to lynch, although for now I’m going to stick with my vote for @markferguson I’m noting now that he has been on the site, he just hasn’t been participating at all in day 2. The same is true of @Wenchiman

I sort of get the Callum vote but I’m definitely not convinced. But we have some time to bring this thing home either way.

I've had my eye on mark as well, D1 silence is iffy, but D2 conversation is needed

waiting to hear back on callum atm on his role/thoughts

with what 4hrs left I'll ##unvote to stop a turbo

2 minutes ago, Madaghmire said:

This is a town move. Although Traingirl does reply a little later and Cal makes no comment on it. Pressure is good, but without follow up its less so. If her answer left you thinking she was still scum, then it needs to be attacked, picked apart and exposed. If its enough that shes not in your crosshairs anymore, then we go somewhere else.

And privately, you may well have, but the rest of us have no indication of that.

I mean, he’s ostensibly pushing for one by pushing inactives.

I did a quick relook and started at pg 8, it looked like you target traingirl. One action doesn’t constitute a pattern. Also, aside from the fact that she posted, and we learned she was having some growing pains transitioning to the forum.

Ideally, we’d also like to murder the right people.

I’m still kinda neutral on Cal, but I suppose I see the appeal if we’re buying that Clon didn’t lie with makicious intent.

Inactive in so much as he had 1-2 more posts then them... hardly much and his lack of follow up is my problem and it still continues he's just happy to die and leave i think

based on what he has to say when he comes back will affirm it for me, I would like to see some solve from all that info he gathered in his opinion, otherwise just looks like scum fishing because at L-2 now L-3 why wouldn't you share your thoughts

Agreed Ebon.

On 1/4/2019 at 9:08 AM, markferguson said:

##roleconfirm

On 1/4/2019 at 9:10 AM, markferguson said:

Last jedi was the best Star Wars film

On 1/4/2019 at 8:52 PM, markferguson said:

So I keep on forgetting to check the message board. I am finding this way of doing things much more difficult

On 1/6/2019 at 10:56 AM, markferguson said:

Ok so we actually need to do something this time or we’re all going to end up dead.

let me start - Adam has been even quieter than the rest of us and while he has given a valid reason, we need a target and it’s the best lead we have

His whole game.

does seem scumariney

@CaryHaneyDC

  @markdedrick:

@JessicaChase

@Wenchiman:

@Traingirl1

@Madaghmire:

  @EbonHawk:

 @clontroper5

 @PodRacer

@Rewen007:

@Stefan

  @markferguson:

@TheCallum

PING: 4hrs ish or so left we need convo from everyone

15 minutes ago, Madaghmire said:

His whole game.

Yeah. Initially I was very suspicious because he didn’t vote to lynch day one, and he’s extremely pro lynch.

It’s at worst scummariney, or at best extremely unhelpful.

@Madaghmire I also attempted to do the same on @Wenchiman but realised he posted.

@EbonHawk I’m not sure what else I can say without sounding like I’m on repeat.

There is no benefit to town for me declaring my role, so I won’t, but I will repeat I am town aligned.

On @Traingirl1, be aware she has history of playing quiet and innocent whilst scum. Combine this with her claim I ritually target her (verifiably not true) to make my vote against her less notable, and she is potentially one to look for.

Who is Stefan? Has that person said anything all game?

1 minute ago, TheCallum said:

@Madaghmire I also attempted to do the same on @Wenchiman but realised he posted.

@EbonHawk I’m not sure what else I can say without sounding like I’m on repeat.

There is no benefit to town for me declaring my role, so I won’t, but I will repeat I am town aligned.

On @Traingirl1, be aware she has history of playing quiet and innocent whilst scum. Combine this with her claim I ritually target her (verifiably not true) to make my vote against her less notable, and she is potentially one to look for.

Can a third party who has played with them before tell me if Traingirls accusation is verifiably untrue?

1 minute ago, TheCallum said:

@EbonHawk I’m not sure what else I can say without sounding like I’m on repeat.

on repeat? you've not said anything to answer my questions?

I asked for your role and who your suspects are this game, due to your apathy towards death...

1 minute ago, Madaghmire said:

Who is Stefan? Has that person said anything all game?

yes, but not much (he has the same photo as JJ)

3 minutes ago, TheCallum said:

On @Traingirl1, be aware she has history of playing quiet and innocent whilst scum. Combine this with her claim I ritually target her (verifiably not true) to make my vote against her less notable, and she is potentially one to look for.

this is helpful though

1 minute ago, Madaghmire said:

Can a third party who has played with them before tell me if Traingirls accusation is verifiably untrue?

and I second this

12 minutes ago, EbonHawk said:

this is helpful though

and I second this

She does have a history while playing as scum of playing extremely innocent and dropping in and out of the chat. This is complicated by the fact that she’ll also do this sometimes as town, so it’s perhaps a Tell but it isn’t 100%.

On the voting thing, it isn’t something I remember particularly. It’s either a lie (possible but not sure how likely) or she is overstating things based on a couple of votes against her by Callum over multiple games. And she was scum at least a couple of times over those games so his votes totally might have been justified! That said, I haven’t taken the time to do the research and confirm this either way, this is my potentially faulty memory.

21 minutes ago, Madaghmire said:

Who is Stefan? Has that person said anything all game?

He made a handful of comments early in the game, complained about the platform, and since then has basically been awol.

Maybe someone who knows these cats wants to drop them a line and remind them that there is a game here?

2 minutes ago, Madaghmire said:

Maybe someone who knows these cats wants to drop them a line and remind them that there is a game here?

I’ve been hesitant to do so due to instructions from @Lord Preyer that we’re not to converse about the game with fellow participants outside of this forum.

But agreed, would be good to get the small handful of typically very active players reengaged.

going for a shower, then round the grandparents. I will vote after my shower as i doubt i'll be back before the deadline

3 hours ago, TheCallum said:

I’ll point out that this is untrue, I’ve just gone back and checked previous games and can’t see a time where this happened. You can verify this with another Brit.

Quick unexpected gap between meetings...

Sorry if that’s not true - was it just the last game? It might have been Cary I was thinking of! FYI all, Callum was spot on about me last game (although not this time) so maybe he is playing this straight.

I’m going to

## unvote@TheCallum

as I think his defence was pretty good will rethink who to target as we do need to lynch someone today

I’m heading into meetings pretty soon which may take me all the way to sunset here. The idea of not lynching on either of the first two days seems ridiculous to me. I’m open to lynching Callum although I don’t fully see it. But I think we have to target somebody.

4 minutes ago, markdedrick said:

I’m heading into meetings pretty soon which may take me all the way to sunset here. The idea of not lynching on either of the first two days seems ridiculous to me. I’m open to lynching Callum although I don’t fully see it. But I think we have to target somebody.

Is markfergusons silence particularly uncharacteristic? If so I’d go with him, or stefan. Not participating is anti town, regardless of their affiliation.

I’m going to switch to

## vote @markferguson for reasons of inactivity.

As such he isn't helping. There’s still time for this to change though.

Back into a 5pm meeting now. How much longer have we got?

6 minutes ago, Madaghmire said:

Is markfergusons silence particularly uncharacteristic? If so I’d go with him, or stefan. Not participating is anti town, regardless of their affiliation.

He’s been very active in our earlier games. So this is out of character. Of course, the same could be said for @Wenchiman and @CaryHaneyDC I voted Mark initially because of his lack of a day one vote and how that seemed suspicious, but I’m comfortable with Mark, Stefan, Adam or Cary at this point for the reasons you name. Non participation doesn’t help us.

I'm going to vote for Wenchiman, I heard his name a few times now from the new guys, and out of the 3 of him, mark, and cary he's been offline nearly a day longer

##vote Wenchiman

Just now, EbonHawk said:

I'm going to vote for Wenchiman, I heard his name a few times now from the new guys, and out of the 3 of him, mark, and cary he's been offline nearly a day longer

##vote Wenchiman

I voted for him on day one, I’m comfortable with that. More so than with @TheCallum at this point

##unvote

##vote @Wenchiman