Article Predictions. Mostly General Discussion. But there's definately some Predictions scattered throughout.

By Drasnighta, in Star Wars: Armada

45 minutes ago, Admiral Calkins said:

Yes. This. And if they really want to simplify it, have a BSG:A “Core Set” with dice, manuever tool, ruler, etc., and then just have expansions for the Galactica, Pegasus, and Cylon Basestars, as well as squadron packs for Vipers, Raptors, Raiders, and Heavy Raiders. There’s your whole game. Doesn’t need to be any more complicated than that.

Literally just make the already existing PC game Battlestar Galactica: Deadlock into a model game

(If you haven't played BSG: Deadlock it's basically Armada as a PC game..

13 minutes ago, EbonHawk said:

BSG armada could take all my money.. Similar to a Stargate one (albeit SG having less ships available)

I'll take multiple Daedalus class Battlecruisers, please.

9 minutes ago, TallGiraffe said:

My only issue with clone wars is a lack of aces

In what way?

Jedi and Named Clones on one side...

... named infamous Droids on the other.

i mean, it’s not like all of those TIE fighter pilots are readily named in canon, either...

1 hour ago, Drasnighta said:

In what way?

Jedi and Named Clones on one side...

... named infamous Droids on the other.

i mean, it’s not like all of those TIE fighter pilots are readily named in canon, either...

You really don't even have to do with 'Infamous Droids', either - although there are a few "named" ones and it's easy enough to just put any letter+number combination together and call it famous (*cough* THX-1138) - the Separatists were more than just the droids. Watching the Clone Wars CGI series...*PLENTY* of Separatist generals and commanders of various alien species along the way.

Although, yeah, on the Republic side...holy crap, all the Jedi, OMG....SOOOO many aces, it's stupid....

4 hours ago, Drasnighta said:

In what way?

Jedi and Named Clones on one side...

... named infamous Droids on the other.

i mean, it’s not like all of those TIE fighter pilots are readily named in canon, either...

Count Dooku, Asajj Ventriss, Cad Bane, Jango Fett, Bossk, Dengar, General Grievous and several more. Even without going full-on dark side there are several named antagonists throughout the Clone Wars that serve as starship pilots and fly primarily either for the CIS or against the Republic. There's also nothing preventing certain droid squadrons from being "upgraded" experimental units, the existence of elite droid units capable of threatening even Jedi is periodically a major plot point during the TV show.

4 hours ago, xanderf said:

You really don't even have to do with 'Infamous Droids', either - although there are a few "named" ones and it's easy enough to just put any letter+number combination together and call it famous (*cough* THX-1138) - the Separatists were more than just the droids. Watching the Clone Wars CGI series...*PLENTY* of Separatist generals and commanders of various alien species along the way.

Although, yeah, on the Republic side...holy crap, all the Jedi, OMG....SOOOO many aces, it's stupid....

The Delta-7 could be an ace-only squadron!

Edited by Atromix

Well as not every jedi was a confident pilot.... plus you can have padawans as your generics!

Completely ok as long as the current Empire faction received the order 66 upgrade card.

On 7/22/2018 at 8:25 AM, EbonHawk said:

I'll only be unhappy with the SSD if Rebels get that god awful bulwark cruiser (if you think it looks nice, well then you are lost)

Imps get SSD i want a MC85

http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/MC85_Star_Cruiser

I was confused, I meant the MC85. For some reason I thought it was called the Bulwark in the WotC Starships miniatures game. It was called the Viscount.

Edited by Bakura83
15 hours ago, TallGiraffe said:

My only issue with clone wars is a lack of aces

The last thing Armada needs is more Aces. I don't see any point to taking non-Aces anymore. Aces are 5x more resilient.

2 hours ago, Thraug said:

The last thing Armada needs is more Aces. I don't see any point to taking non-Aces anymore. Aces are 5x more resilient.

Actually double brace aces are, as much just 2x.

Taking 1 hit attacks stands the same.

Taking 2 hits attacks

- 4 hull: 4 attacks vs 2

- 5-6 hull: 5 attacks vs 3

- 7 hull: 6 attacks vs 4

Taking 3 hits attacks

- 4 hull: 2 attacks vs 2

- 5-6 hull: 3 attacks vs 2

- 7 hull : 4 attacks vs 3

Even if you manage to save tokens for a following rounds of fire (let's say your opponent cannot focus enough attacks during the same round) the difference won't go beyond the double.

Scatter aces are harder to calculate as if you don't roll accuracies and don't make more than one attack per round they will be inmortal. If you manage to focus fire during the same round they are not far more durable than a double brace.

1 hit attacks

- 3 hull: 5 attacks vs 3

- 4 hull: 6 attacks vs 4

2 hit attacks

- 3 hull: 5 attacks vs 2

- 4 hull: 5 attacks vs 2

3 hits attacks

- 3 hull: 4 attacks vs 1

- 4 hull: 4 attacks vs 2

Considering they will take at least to attack per round and will save the scatter for following rounds, scatter aces can stand a lot, like 7 attacks vs 3/2 for a general tie fighter.

Aces are definitely toughter but I didn't see any that took 10 shots to be killed. Not even Ciena. Of course a 5 hull regular squadron can be one-shotted, even a 6 hull one but an ace won't stand 5 shots under fire of the same power. They are protected from an eventual lucky roll though.

Add accuracies and the ace's resiliency will fall.

Edited by ovinomanc3r

Bump.

hqdefault.jpg

Deleted at request

Edited by Megatronrex

what has this world come too...

@Megatronrex

please dont get this thread locked.

You KNOW threads have been locked for less.

I heard Carry Fisher will be back for episode IX. Disney likes Necromancy...

46 minutes ago, ovinomanc3r said:

I heard Carry Fisher will be back for episode IX. Disney likes Necromancy...

Unused Footage.

Not “exactly” the same thing...

... although one could find an Argument that Rogue One legitimized it...

2 hours ago, Drasnighta said:

Unused Footage.

Not “exactly” the same thing...

... although one could find an Argument that Rogue One legitimized it...

B0FiHGY.png

So for those more clues in than I, are we expecting something on Wednesday evening, or could it equally be anytime between now and the weekend?

just trying to curb my hype.

Edited by Bakura83
8 minutes ago, Bakura83 said:

So for those more clues in than I, are we expecting something on Wednesday evening, or could it equally be anytime between now and the weekend?

just trying to curb my hype.

I wouldn't say anyone is expecting anything. We're all pretty much just hoping for anything.

33 minutes ago, Bakura83 said:

So for those more clues in than I, are we expecting something on Wednesday evening, or could it equally be anytime between now and the weekend?

just trying to curb my hype.

I'd say we are expecting something as much as we were during the special announcement that ended up being X-Wing 2.0. If IA and Legion are anything to go by I wouldn't expect us getting anything new announced until some time in October.

I have literally no expectations. I want armada to exist while buying into Kill team and starting a local campaign of it.

I didn't leave armada, FFG took it away from me.

1 hour ago, dominosfleet said:

I have literally no expectations. I want armada to exist while buying into Kill team and starting a local campaign of it.

I didn't leave armada, FFG took it away from me.

Apologies in advance for sounding like an ****, but I kinda.... really disagree with this sentiment.

FFG didn’t take anything away.

You got tired of waiting.

They're not COMPLETELY blameless for setting the scenario up, for sure - ideally, that wouldn’t have happened... but only YOU are responsible for your reaction to it.

Edited by Drasnighta
1 hour ago, Drasnighta said:

Apologies in advance for sounding like an ****, but I kinda.... really disagree with this sentiment.

FFG didn’t take anything away.

You got tired of waiting.

They're not COMPLETELY blameless for setting the scenario up, for sure - ideally, that wouldn’t have happened... but only YOU are responsible for your reaction to it.

I agree with everything you said but not knowing what word you were using in the bolded part is gonna bug me all day.

I am excited at the potential for today.

Not so excited about going to work in the meanwhile. LOL!