I would have prefered they keep all of the freighter-like ships to packs like R&V, just because I don't personally like having a lot of duplicates of the freighters on the table (8 YT2400s looks hilariously dumb to me), but I like having a lot of the "standard" squadrons available. As long as I can trade some of the VCXs and Lambdas away, it's not a huge deal.
Article Predictions. Mostly General Discussion. But there's definately some Predictions scattered throughout.
The new X-Wing article makes me excited to read a similar one from JJ about whatever he helps design!
https://www.fantasyflightgames.com/en/news/2017/1/23/boshek/
I found this thread on page three. C'est impossible!!
So, erm... How about...
The next article will appear ...two week from now, and it will be about ...how to make Cluster Bombs work!
I'm considering using them in the Conflict...
... I mean, I have a spare Defensive Retrofit on my MC80, and basically, I can make sure I fight against the Empire Fleets who don't have Rhymer.....
People decided to move on to the Wave 6 prediction thread. WE NEED A NECROMANCER!
Threadcromancer!
Are you looking for me?
Oh ****! This "necro"guy again. Why people love death and died stuff? What the hell is wrong with you?
Sheeps are cute and wool is soft.
So what about the FAQ? So people can stop arguing over how Flechette and RLB work...
What's in dispute about Flechettes?
Enough to make me quit rules.
4 hours ago, Drasnighta said:Enough to make me quit rules.
Holy sh*t they broke Dras.
6 hours ago, Drasnighta said:Enough to make me quit rules.
Let me cram that common sense down your throat, because obviously I am right when you just think about it 
amirite? Course I am. You just use common sense while I disregard everything you already said, even when you are acknowledging my point of view.
Cuz common sense.
just got back from the flechette thread...... Ummmm...... Uh...... Dafaq?
TIL I've been using squadron activation sliders all wrong the whole time.
(lel)
Edited by EggzavierUgh, just read that stupid Kallus+Flechettes+QLT thread. I'm a rules as intended kind of guy, but the intent and the rules as written are damned clear to me. How in the world did that thread get past the first page? Oh right, personal insults. That thread is all kinds of stupid. I will now go back to ignoring the rules forum as much as possible.
Edited by Truthiness13 minutes ago, Truthiness said:Ugh, just read that stupid Kallus+Flechettes+QLT thread. I'm a rules as intended kind of guy, but the intent and the rules as written are damned clear to me. How in the world did that thread get past the first page? Oh right, personal insults. That thread is all kinds of stupid. I will now go back to ignoring the rules forum as much as possible.
If you like slights against other people, you should read the RLb thread...
3 minutes ago, Undeadguy said:If you like slights against other people, you should read the RLb thread...
I could tell two replies into that one it was going to get ugly. It can only be worse since there are legitimate problems with that card.
I thought the RLB thread was at least civil for the part that I was involved in.
I don't know how or when the nastiness seeped in.
1 hour ago, Eggzavier said:I thought the RLB thread was at least civil for the part that I was involved in.
I don't know how or when the nastiness seeped in.
It's been the more recent developments than when we discussed it over a month ago.
Bounders.
15 hours ago, Drasnighta said:Enough to make me quit rules.
So I thought you were being dramatic (sorry for the assumption), then decided to go read the thread. What in the world was that passive-aggressive, illogical nonsense about. Sorry to everyone who had to go through that discussion.
I was mistaken about his/her rule misunderstanding. Also, people in glass houses shouldn't throw stones.
Mistaken rule.
4 hours ago, Undeadguy said:If you like slights against other people, you should read the RLb thread...
whats sad is that one started out great
1 hour ago, ryanabt said:So I thought you were being dramatic (sorry for the assumption), then decided to go read the thread. What in the world was that passive-aggressive, illogical nonsense about. Sorry to everyone who had to go through that discussion.
As a side note, played a vassal game with that person and he/she told me that the station doesn't obstruct, so...
Depends on the objective. Certain objectives remove the effects of the station.
10 minutes ago, TallGiraffe said:Depends on the objective. Certain objectives remove the effects of the station.
Good call. Forgot about that and he was right. Honestly serves me right for getting snarky.
No Dras! We need your insight when it comes to rules interpretation! Don't let them get you down.