N0-1_H3r3 said:
ak-73 said:
That player's resort to cliche is often not to be prevented. I have an Ultramarine Tactical in my group after all. That is just as typecasting as giving the WS/BS bonus.
Thing is, though, that an Ultramarine isn't particularly 'missing out' if he chooses a different speciality - Ultramarines are good squad leaders in any speciality, due to their flexible characteristic bonuses and easy access to Command (the only thing they lose, really, is the advantage of their Chapter squad attack - because the squad defence doesn't actually care if the squad consists of Ultramarines or not, as it just replenishes Cohesion).
Give a character a WS bonus, then they'll pick Assault Marine more often than not. Give a character a BS bonus, they'll pick Devastator more often than not. In either case, choosing a role that doesn't take advantage of their inherent characteristic advantage will frequently be seen as 'wasting' it. Given that, Black Templars aside, we know that these chapters have the full range of Assault, Devastator and Tactical marines (or equivalents), why should the rules so strongly encourage players to go for self-imposed stereotypes because they think of their chapter as "the melee chapter"?
If you want to represent inclinations, use Demeanours and mode abilities.
While what you said is true, would you pick a specialty because your chapter gives you a 5% bonus over other chapters? Isn't that a negligible"waste"?
Alex