So, our group was looking over some of the weaponry for a terminator and one of my players came to this conclusion...
A storm bolter is a better weapon (more shots and more damage) than an assault cannon.
Now, please keep in mind that he has never played any other 40k game at all (either RPG or tabletop). To the opposite extreme, I have played 40k tabletop since 1992 and have played DH and RT. His comment made me wince. I asked him to explain.
Here is his math (I don't have my book on me right now so a few of my numbers may be slightly off, but not by much):
Example BS = 50 (+20 for full auto)
Assault cannon can only fire on full auto, so let's compare that.
Assault cannon full auto = 10 shots. Each hit does 3d10+6 damage (averaged to 22.5 excluding Righteous Fury)
Storm Bolter full auto = 4 shots + Storm trait. Each hit does 2d10+5 damage (averaged to 16 excluding Righteous Fury)
So, with an attack roll of 69 (success, with no degrees of success)...Assault Cannon does 22.5 and the Storm Bolter does 32 (because of two hits from the storm)
Attack roll of 40...Assault Cannon does 67.5 damage and the Storm Bolter does 96.
Attack roll of 30...Assault Cannon does 90 and the Storm Bolter does 128 (its maximum fire rate)
Attack roll of 20...Assault Cannon does 112.5 and the Storm Bolter still does 128.
Attack roll of 10...Assault Cannon does 135 and the Storm Bolter still does 128.
So, the assault cannon becomes advantageous at an attack roll of 10 or less. Is there something I'm missing? Knowing that tabletop game, the assault cannon has twice the firing rate of the storm bolter. It seems that an easy fix would be to give the assault cannon the "storm" trait. The storm trait does describe multiple barrles shooting and the assault cannon is six spinning barrels.
Anyone have any ideas or comments?