Reckless Diversion and Arsenal/Multi-Attacks?

By lologrelol, in Rules

I used Han's Reckless Diversion card against Grievous, who has a gun and two sabers.

Grievous is in gun range of Han (who he must target this round, if able), but not saber range. Grievous is also in melee with a unit. Grievous has arsenal 2. Grievous' gun has Versatile (You can perform ranged attacks using this weapon while engaged.).

1. Can Grievous attack Han with the gun, but also put one of his sabers into a unit he's currently in melee with?
2. Or must Grievous only attack Han with the gun (since the gun has range and combat)?

The answer is 1. Grievous must attack Han only of he can, and in that scenario he can only attack him with the gun and he has no other available weapon to attack Han so he can use one of the sabers to attack another unit thanks to Arsenal 2.

Yep! Agreed with that assessment

12 hours ago, Lemmiwinks86 said:

The answer is 1. Grievous must attack Han only of he can, and in that scenario he can only attack him with the gun and he has no other available weapon to attack Han so he can use one of the sabers to attack another unit thanks to Arsenal 2.

Not entirely sure of that , yes they must attack han if able but since arsenal let's you attack up to two units when it comes to declare the defender for the saber attack, Han isn't a valid target so you could select another.

5 minutes ago, syrath said:

Not entirely sure of that , yes they must attack han if able but since arsenal let's you attack up to two units when it comes to declare the defender for the saber attack, Han isn't a valid target so you could select another.

That's exactly what he's saying?

2 hours ago, arnoldrew said:

That's exactly what he's saying?

Sorry completely misread that