Carolina Krayts is the best X-Wing podcast

By SaltMaster 5000, in X-Wing

20 minutes ago, gennataos said:

Starting point, kind of? I wouldn't bring 5A to an event. I'd trade three a-wings for Rey, add optics and prockets to taste, punch bugs off mat.

Something like this?

RZ-2 A-wing - •Tallissan Lintra - 47
•Tallissan Lintra - Deadly Approach (36)
Heroic (1)
Proton Rockets (6)
Advanced Optics (4)

Scavenged YT-1300 Light Freighter - •Rey - 101
•Rey - Resourceful Scavenger (68)
Proton Rockets (6)
•Rose Tico (9)
•Korr Sella (6)
•Rey’s Millennium Falcon (2)
•Finn (10)

RZ-2 A-wing - •Zizi Tlo - 52
•Zizi Tlo - Committed to the Cause (41)
Heroic (1)
Proton Rockets (6)
Advanced Optics (4)

Total: 200/200

View in the X-Wing Squad Builder

3 minutes ago, Spinland said:

Something like this?

RZ-2 A-wing - •Tallissan Lintra - 47
•Tallissan Lintra - Deadly Approach (36)
Heroic (1)
Proton Rockets (6)
Advanced Optics (4)

Scavenged YT-1300 Light Freighter - •Rey - 101
•Rey - Resourceful Scavenger (68)
Proton Rockets (6)
•Rose Tico (9)
•Korr Sella (6)
•Rey’s Millennium Falcon (2)
•Finn (10)

RZ-2 A-wing - •Zizi Tlo - 52
•Zizi Tlo - Committed to the Cause (41)
Heroic (1)
Proton Rockets (6)
Advanced Optics (4)

Total: 200/200

View in the X-Wing Squad Builder

No procket on Rey, otherwise yeah.

4 minutes ago, gennataos said:

No procket on Rey, otherwise yeah.

Would you leave the six points for bid? I went Talli because with L'ulo I came up one point short of giving both the As Heroic.

EDIT: Elusive, Crack Shot or Predator all look interesting,

Edited by Spinland
4 minutes ago, Spinland said:

Would you leave the six points for bid? I went Talli because with L'ulo I came up one point short of giving both the As Heroic.

EDIT: Elusive, Crack Shot or Predator all look interesting,

I have no idea where bids should be, but I do think there's point with a list where adding anything else is either (maybe unnecessary/unreliable?) anti-meta tech or filler nonsense because you believe in your ability to outplay those moving after you. (most of us are wrong on that account)


Predator and Crack Shot only work for primary attacks, so no help with Prockets, which is the only time I'd consider diving into a risky situation with those A-Wings to shoot. Hunting bullseye too much even for the procket is rife with peril, I'd disregard it entirely for a primary attack.

Elusive...doing a red maneuver with an RZ-2 A-Wing should be a rare occurrence that it's a thing of legend...whispered about in dark corners of game stores, but no one can claim to have seen it in person.

15 hours ago, Bucknife said:

The issue I see is that, contrary to 5Yions back in wave 2, the SpamTex swarm sits at I4.

This was definitely what struck me as weird.

Two changes ago, FFG effectively said, "You know what, high-Init ships with passive mods are fine with us. What we're going to do is let you have lots of low-Init ships, and see if those can compete."

And then they immediately undercut that with the Nantex, whose I4 and two talent slots (arguably) drives all the other generic spam away from the table, and necessitates high-Init and passive mods to deal with. (Keep in mind that I haven't played with or against the Nantex since they were nuked way back when. This is just what it looks like to me.)

It was a weird decision.

Why can't it be a balancing move?

e: meta counter-balancing to generic spam. Not game balance of course

Edited by GreenDragoon
24 minutes ago, Jeff Wilder said:

Two changes ago, FFG effectively said, "You know what, high-Init ships with passive mods are fine with us. What we're going to do is let you have lots of low-Init ships, and see if those can compete."

This part I totally agree with, FFG seems to have realized that every faction (except CIS, for now) can and does fly three high init high reposition passive mod aces so any concerns about "spam" are out the window. Like if we can spam aces, we might as well be allowed to spam other stuff too, hence various break points (5 X-Wings, 8 TIE FOs, 5 TIE Reapers, 6 TIE Interceptors, whatever you like to point to). The problem is there's a second half to that sentence. When they said "let's see if those can compete", the answer was a resounding no. It's not a fair trade. Spamming the same kind of generic is a lot less helpful than spamming oops all aces.

25 minutes ago, Jeff Wilder said:

And then they immediately undercut that with the Nantex, whose I4 and two talent slots (arguably) drives all the other generic spam away from the table, and necessitates high-Init and passive mods to deal with. (Keep in mind that I haven't played with or against the Nantex since they were nuked way back when. This is just what it looks like to me.)

I'm not sure I get this. I think you need to try playing some low init stuff against Nantexans? blocking them actually really matters, and if you spread out you can deny them getting bullseye on the same target at once. I am unironically much more comfortable playing against them with my generic dudes than my aces.

1 hour ago, Boom Owl said:

orfTgm8.png😃
BmG8sP1.png😃
8JrRFBK.png😃
ILJxyuX.png😃
RXtPMK0.png😡

3c3b1ff24730099a88ae712f457db658.gif

Force Aces are Bad is Old News. Still True. Just Old.

Edited by theBitterFig

FFG also said they want to mix up the meta. That means we really shouldn't expect them to be consistent, rather the opposite. They want to mix it up, so why is "i6 with passives is fine for a season" followed by "i4 jousters are fine for a season" not in line with that?

e: The circle jerk is a bit too strong by now. I get that it's just an online thing, but... https://imgur.com/gallery/5ZjKcmU

Edited by GreenDragoon
17 minutes ago, GreenDragoon said:

FFG also said they want to mix up the meta.

This feels less like a "Shake up the meta" choice and more like a "Oops, all Phantoms" choice. More than likely, it was something that they didn't have optics on, and it slipped through the cracks. It's going to shake up the meta for certain, but so far, the immediate shakeup seems to be "go back to high orange and purple numbers".

And that is only going to prove @Boom Owl correct about his consistent ranting about "Aces", and we all know that we cannot let him be right.

One of the few things Meta-Wing is actually semi-interesting for is looking at X-Wing History over the long haul. All Formats All Time.

I for one remember when this thread was called "Carolina Krayts is the best Wedge podcast"

icOsaYR.png

Edited by Boom Owl

So exactly how many spamtex in the top 32 this weekend are required before it's acceptable to whinge? More than 4?

1 hour ago, GreenDragoon said:

FFG also said they want to mix up the meta. That means we really shouldn't expect them to be consistent, rather the opposite. They want to mix it up, so why is "i6 with passives is fine for a season" followed by "i4 jousters are fine for a season" not in line with that?

I think noting that points are a way to churn meta and not an objective value of a ship is the correct take.

18 minutes ago, gamblertuba said:

So exactly how many spamtex in the top 32 this weekend are required before it's acceptable to whinge? More than 4?

The truth is only you can decide how you want to fill out the "Sad" vs "Bad" Survey.

It only ever reflects 1 player's survey responses at a time.

Let me know what should be categorized as "Sad" below and I am more than happy to update it for you.

In the end the choice is yours entirely.

nFvp1oo.png

Edited by Boom Owl
45 minutes ago, Boom Owl said:

One of the few things Meta-Wing is actually semi-interesting for is looking at X-Wing History over the long haul. All Formats All Time.

I for one remember when this thread was called "Carolina Krayts is the best Wedge podcast"

icOsaYR.png

Yeah but if nantex are good I'll have to take big orange instead of taking big orange.

27 minutes ago, jagsba said:

Yeah but if nantex are good I'll have to take big orange instead of taking big orange.

What about big purple?

1 hour ago, 5050Saint said:

they didn't have optics on,

Devs don't have a tech slot, and neither do Nantex.

1 hour ago, Boom Owl said:

One of the few things Meta-Wing is actually semi-interesting for is looking at X-Wing History over the long haul. All Formats All Time.

I for one remember when this thread was called "Carolina Krayts is the best Wedge podcast"

icOsaYR.png

Felt quite pleased with my hipsterness, counting only 8 pilots I've used more than once or twice.

5 of the top 6..... I'll let that slide.

1 hour ago, gamblertuba said:

So exactly how many spamtex in the top 32 this weekend are required before it's acceptable to whinge? More than 4?

Depends on how many are taken. If 4 of 16 make it, it is worth noting. If 4 of 6 make it, it is definitely worth noting. If 4 of 3 make it, it is... unpossible.

There were 40ish Phantoms in the top 23 cut at Adepticon 2019, IIRC, which was a good indicator of something being amiss.

7 minutes ago, 5050Saint said:

Depends on how many are taken. If 4 of 16 make it, it is worth noting. If 4 of 6 make it, it is definitely worth noting. If 4 of 3 make it, it is... unpossible.

There were 40ish Phantoms in the top 23 cut at Adepticon 2019, IIRC, which was a good indicator of something being amiss.

This math is, if anything, too rigorous for the forums.

1 hour ago, gamblertuba said:

So exactly how many spamtex in the top 32 this weekend are required before it's acceptable to whinge? More than 4?

The math is pretty weird on this.

After a certain saturation, you start having the list eat itself with multiple mirror matches.

The graph starts like this in theory...

c05.png

But after around 300 participants, you pass the 'Texan threshold and enter a state of meta-steria where reality takes a vacation and no ships are good anymore.

apecon_review.jpg

27 minutes ago, Bucknife said:

The math is pretty weird on this.

After a certain saturation, you start having the list eat itself with multiple mirror matches.

The graph starts like this in theory...

c05.png

But after around 300 participants, you pass the 'Texan threshold and enter a state of meta-steria where reality takes a vacation and no ships are good anymore.

apecon_review.jpg

Is this SUSY? Never did get the hang of Feynman diagrams

Edited by jagsba

jeremy_bearimy_by_dddontshoot_dcqdhns-25

?charts

kzbBTnm_d.webp?maxwidth=640&shape=thumb&

unified_jank_theory.png

Capture.PNG

joustvenndiagram.jpg

2245FC38580D539E1A.png

6Steps5Whys_LandscapeStanding_500x500.pn

3 hours ago, jagsba said:

Yeah but if nantex are good I'll have to take big orange instead of taking big orange.

It's funny that you say that when the past half year has seen unprecedented 44% generics, up from 32% last year . Squads with no unique at all increased from 7% to 12% - almost doubled compared to April last year. Mainly scum, imperial and FO, total 89 squads out of 745 lists. (space jam events + corellia)

But don't let your dreams be dreams!

2 hours ago, theBitterFig said:

jeremy_bearimy_by_dddontshoot_dcqdhns-25

I understood that reference!