dutpotd said:
darklogos said:
otakuV said:
wow this has got to be the stupidest thread ive every seen and im sorry that im responsible.my one deck doewsnt kill the game and there is no way for you to hypothesis how to stop it because you dont know what it is.Im not a newb player and am probubly one of the tops so i look at what can stop my deck tand take care of it.one attack deck is a challenge and thats why i like it.this wont make me take the deck apart and since no one knows what it is it wont be a trend so chill out.darkwhatever.
Lets see. You make strong claims in the other thread about control decks. You post that you've tested this deck and its only lost twice. You revert to a heavy emphasis on control and most likely are valued but not trusted looping. If you were a noob i would have written it off as thread trolling and ignored you. But your sig tells me otherwise that you are not trolling and telling the truth. So its an overeaction to stop something I think is toxic and bad for the game? Right.
If it won't be a trend publish the deck. You would have no fear of netdeckers because the deck is not that strong. But the truth is you haven't published the deck so it has a good amount of strength to it.
It isn't toxic for the game to have multiple ways to play and still win. You are overreacting, what with little information and young card pool.
If someting always wins and takes little to no skill then there is a big problem. I gaurantee you that Nick is skilled and that skill is part of the reason why the deck is racking up more wins than losses (but it still does lose), not that he has broke the game and is secretly protecting the a-bomb of decks that once played will certainly win and dull the senses of all it beats into submission...
Nick isn't the type to post his deck, some people are the type and some aren't. The reason he isn't posting has nothing to do with trends, it has to do with personal choice and a dis-taste for copy cats. I, for one, respect this choice and think all you are doing with this thread is makeing a big deal out of nothing.
- dut
"MY DECK ONLY LOST TWICE!"
To who? Against what competition? Insufficient data is insufficient. It'd be like if I were to say "Guys I've got a killer deck that's only lost twice."
Who in their right mind would actually trust me without seeing a decklist?