3 hours ago, Eskandare said:Play X-Wing (PC) and shunt all power to your engines.
Play TIE Fighter and fly a Missile Boat, shunting Shields, lasers and beam weapon all to engines. Then SLAM. (Make sure your Laser was supercharged prior)
3 hours ago, Eskandare said:Play X-Wing (PC) and shunt all power to your engines.
Play TIE Fighter and fly a Missile Boat, shunting Shields, lasers and beam weapon all to engines. Then SLAM. (Make sure your Laser was supercharged prior)
2 hours ago, HolySorcerer said:Exactly, Han is liar and a cheat. The Falcon outruns nothing in the original trilogy, it is not a fast ship. He was just trying to land a deal for some much needed cash so he could pay off his debtors. Han even demonstrates his complete lack of knowledge with the whole parsecs thing, he's just trying to use fancy sounding space words to impress the ignorant dirt farmers looking for transport.
Lando said the Falcon was the fastest hunk of junk in the galaxy, which is probably correct, as most pieces of garbage just tend to float there.
He also said it saved him on several occasions, so I guess that’s probably the snuggling compartments and false IDs.
Edited by GrimmyV1 hour ago, GrimmyV said:...so I guess that’s probably the snuggling compartments and false IDs.
Mmmmm, snuggling compartments... ![]()
5 hours ago, HolySorcerer said:Han even demonstrates his complete lack of knowledge with the whole parsecs thing, he's just trying to use fancy sounding space words to impress the ignorant dirt farmers looking for transport.
What I don't understand is why he was wrong here: it was the first star wars movie ever, they could easily have said that hyperspace contracts realspace, so in that case travelling a shorter distance would be an indicator of how fast your ship is.
Just now, Infinite_Maelstrom said:What I don't understand is why he was wrong here: it was the first star wars movie ever, they could easily have said that hyperspace contracts realspace, so in that case travelling a shorter distance would be an indicator of how fast your ship is.
Or, and stay with me here, the screenwriter wanted a sciencey sounding space word and misused it.
1 minute ago, HolySorcerer said:Or, and stay with me here, the screenwriter wanted a sciencey sounding space word and misused it.
That's obvious, but what I don't get is why they didn't retcon it.
Just now, Infinite_Maelstrom said:That's obvious, but what I don't get is why they didn't retcon it.
They did do a hamfisted retcon. It was stupid. My "retcon" is that Han is a liar and a cheat and was trying to sound impressive, and failed.
3 hours ago, Infinite_Maelstrom said:That's obvious, but what I don't get is why they didn't retcon it.
I guess the Han Solo movie will show us the infamous Kessel Run. And yes, they retconned it, saying Han shortened the distance by flying close to black holes or something.
4 minutes ago, Odanan said:I guess the Han Solo movie will show us the infamous Kessel Run. And yes, they retconned it, saying Han shortened the distance by flying close to black holes or something.
The Maw, but yeah. Bracken’s rewrite is far dumber than the dodgy, anomaly skimming retcon. Disney doesn’t need to change everything under the hood.
18 minutes ago, Lobokai said:The Maw, but yeah. Bracken’s rewrite is far dumber than the dodgy, anomaly skimming retcon. Disney doesn’t need to change everything under the hood.
Make a special edition and add dinosaurs but don’t fix a line of dialogue that shows the ignorance of the writers and directors. Brilliant.
even worse, 40 years later make a movie mentioning the original ignorant line of dialogue.
15 hours ago, Infinite_Maelstrom said:
Whoa!
Tell me that's not a photo-chop job?
If that really is the First Order version of our Five Winged Saviour - wouldn't that make it a GFO?
This version has triple-load torpedo launchers, quad-double-lasers, quad ion canons and double-slam!
Ok. Ewok made me do it.
^Puts away bag of psyc- shrooms^
1 hour ago, Alpha Xg1 said:Whoa!
Tell me that's not a photo-chop job?
If that really is the First Order version of our Five Winged Saviour - wouldn't that make it a GFO?
This version has triple-load torpedo launchers, quad-double-lasers, quad ion canons and double-slam!
Ok. Ewok made me do it.
^Puts away bag of psyc- shrooms^
Sooo. First Order Gunboat Ace pack, with TWO gunboats, one in Imperial, one in FO colors, a first order refit modification, that adds a tech slot, a second generic with EPT, and Marek Steele!
DARE TO DREAM BIG!
In the Falcon's defense, it DID outrun the explosion of the Death Star II. That's something even a TIE Interceptor couldn't do. And the Falcon is also a good chunk of engine.
I'm guessing that it has a lot of capability in each of its systems but not enough power to reach the full capability of any of them. Have an ISD at close range? All power from weapons to shields and just enough power to keep ahead of it. Being assailed by fighters? Split power between shields and weaponry and just keep in a straight line to give the gunners a chance to fire (unless of course you have a stormtrooper janitor manning the turret at which point by all means weave away). Need to escape a big boom? Throw all the coal into the fire and get out of dodge.
2 hours ago, rubberduck said:
Yes! Yes indeed! Just remove the tail gunner.
1 hour ago, flyboymb said:In the Falcon's defense, it DID outrun the explosion of the Death Star II. That's something even a TIE Interceptor couldn't do. And the Falcon is also a good chunk of engine.
I'm guessing that it has a lot of capability in each of its systems but not enough power to reach the full capability of any of them. Have an ISD at close range? All power from weapons to shields and just enough power to keep ahead of it. Being assailed by fighters? Split power between shields and weaponry and just keep in a straight line to give the gunners a chance to fire (unless of course you have a stormtrooper janitor manning the turret at which point by all means weave away). Need to escape a big boom? Throw all the coal into the fire and get out of dodge.
...or if you are like me in X-Wing (PC) dump all your shields into the engines and fly around like a bat out of ****. "I don't need no stinkin' shields! If a TIE fighter can do it, so can I!" I started to do that after playing TIE Fighter back in the day.
Now I think of that, I'd like to see a story about a TIE ace, defected to the rebellion, who flys an X-Wing with no shields and all the power to the engines.
2 hours ago, Eskandare said:Yes! Yes indeed! Just remove the tail gunner.
...or if you are like me in X-Wing (PC) dump all your shields into the engines and fly around like a bat out of ****. "I don't need no stinkin' shields! If a TIE fighter can do it, so can I!" I started to do that after playing TIE Fighter back in the day.
Now I think of that, I'd like to see a story about a TIE ace, defected to the rebellion, who flys an X-Wing with no shields and all the power to the engines.
I usually had weapons on max and shields into engines myself. I'd shunt lasers into shields as I was able. Facing 6 TIEs was no issue when you had low shields. Getting a lucky broadside from a Nebulon had you shocking your lips kissing your shield capacitors as soon as you landed.
8 hours ago, Alpha Xg1 said:Whoa! Tell me that's not a photo-chop job?
It'a not. It's an actual still from the trailer:
Skip to 1:40. Difficult to tell exactly what it actually is, but that wing configuration is VERY familiar.
7 hours ago, RufusDaMan said:Sooo. First Order Gunboat Ace pack, with TWO gunboats, one in Imperial, one in FO colors, a first order refit modification, that adds a tech slot, a second generic with EPT, and Marek Steele!
Or one in First Order colors, and one Missile Boat model...
...but let's not get too far ahead of ourselves here. Let's get (multiple copies of) the Alpha-class Star Wing Expansion Pack in our hands first, shall we? Come on SWX69!
15 hours ago, Infinite_Maelstrom said:That's obvious, but what I don't get is why they didn't retcon it.
Who says they won't. There IS a Han Solo movie coming up.
3 things I fully expect to happen in that movie:
Han saving Chewie's life.
Han winning the Falcon from Lando.
The Kessel run.
31 minutes ago, DarthEnderX said:Who says they won't. There IS a Han Solo movie coming up.
3 things I fully expect to happen in that movie:
Han saving Chewie's life.
Han winning the Falcon from Lando.
The Kessel run.
God I hope not. Bring us original content.
5 minutes ago, thespaceinvader said:God I hope not. Bring us original content.
Be preparred to be dissapointed, Ron Howard already confirmed the Kessel Run. I bet we will also see Hans meeting with Boba and Jabba. Its going to be the most eventfull week of Hans life ;).
To be realistic about The Last Jedi "gunboat... Its probably a shuttle, we need those for the Empire!
34 minutes ago, thespaceinvader said:God I hope not. Bring us original content.
Your naivete is adorable...
9 minutes ago, DarthEnderX said:Your naivete is adorable...
I'm expecting a retread of all the stuff we already know.
But I can hope.
3 hours ago, FTS Gecko said:Skip to 1:40. Difficult to tell exactly what it actually is, but that wing configuration is VERY familiar!
Probably a small utility shuttle.
But I still want it to be the GUNBOAT.
13 hours ago, Odanan said:I guess the Han Solo movie will show us the infamous Kessel Run. And yes, they retconned it, saying Han shortened the distance by flying close to black holes or something.
I always assumed it meant that the safe route to Kessel and back is super long to avoid asteroid fields and such but he took super risky short cuts and made the distance insanely short.
2 hours ago, DarthEnderX said:Who says they won't. There IS a Han Solo movie coming up.
3 things I fully expect to happen in that movie:
Han saving Chewie's life.
Han winning the Falcon from Lando.
The Kessel run.
And Han doing shady business with Jabba.
(maybe showing the Millennium Falcon pushing a big cargo? - and dumping it to avoid the Imperial Customs)
Edited by Odanan