Hope for One's People is an auto include in any Fire deck, regardless of if you can influence desperation or not. it's a 0/5. SPAMMY SPAMMY SPAM SPAM.
Tech Talk: Fire
HolyDragonCloud said:
Hope for One's People is an auto include in any Fire deck, regardless of if you can influence desperation or not. it's a 0/5. SPAMMY SPAMMY SPAM SPAM.
The Tae Kwon Do Zephyr is better IMO for an 0/5 for fire to spam. However, Hope for Ones People is easily just as sexy.
It depends. You might end up having the opportunity to hit desperation more often than you would need to stop Rejection from totally neutering your attack.
I'd play Hope For One's People over Tae Kwon Do Zepher any day. You can counter Rejection with No Memories, Bitter Rivals, and something else but I can't figure it out. However, if you have the space to run both (highly doubtful), by all means do so.
EIGHT 0/5 drops mainboard?!? In block 3?!?!? UNHEARD OF!!!!!
Well, I'm not really sure any deck has "room" for anything these days
Between necessary/desirable anti-some-dumb-card tech, and various plain old good cards, I'd be surprised if brainstorming for any deck didn't leave someone with an intial 80-120 card wishlist of stuff they might want in. Given that fact, I like Hope as a 2 or 3-of main (depending on how many other cheap foundations you have) with 1 or maybe 2 in the board to bring in against decks where it seems likely you'll actually have a turn with desperation active. (as opposed to decks that kill in one turn and never give you the chance)
Astrid + 59 other cards, most of which are weapons. Try it and break the game in half. Absurd has nothing on how broke she is (using the term broken to mean something game-breaking here, not greater than average like its normally used).
Omar was making a big deal about Astrid, and more or less rightfully so. But she's a completely different kind of deck idea. A good one at that.
Fire and Order together (nicey nice), a great damage pump that when built right can be huge for just one foundation, and on top of that she can play every weapon attack as a reversal and it can't be negated! Yeah astrid is pretty ballin in my mind and I know of one guy in my group going nuts to build her.
HolyDragonCloud said:
Omar was making a big deal about Astrid, and more or less rightfully so. But she's a completely different kind of deck idea. A good one at that.
One of the players in my group that drafted astrid built her for constructed she is pretty nasty I am just loving how UFS is picking up with set 12.
Scubadude said:
HolyDragonCloud said:
Omar was making a big deal about Astrid, and more or less rightfully so. But she's a completely different kind of deck idea. A good one at that.
One of the players in my group that drafted astrid built her for constructed she is pretty nasty I am just loving how UFS is picking up with set 12.
I think it's a **** shame Astrid doesn't share any symbols with Flash of the Blades.
Cascade said:
Scubadude said:
HolyDragonCloud said:
Omar was making a big deal about Astrid, and more or less rightfully so. But she's a completely different kind of deck idea. A good one at that.
One of the players in my group that drafted astrid built her for constructed she is pretty nasty I am just loving how UFS is picking up with set 12.
I think it's a **** shame Astrid doesn't share any symbols with Flash of the Blades.
if she did i would have built her already. there's always seals...