The AT-TE was used in space on asteroids.

Why couldn't ATATs or ATSTs function in non-atmospheric conditions?

All I can imagine is an AT-AT ponderously flailing its legs in the vacuum... and getting nowhere. LOL

Yes, I know you meant, put it on a surface, but this IS a space combat game, not a land-control game.

IG-2000, because IG-88 needs to terrorize the table top.

If you put in speeders and AT-ATs then you're turning it into a combined arms game, at which point I no longer care.

I'd like to see the TIE variants from the EU: Avenger, Defender, Automated, Hunter, Phantom, Aggressor, Oppressor, etc. And I'd like to see a good rendition of the E-wing and K-wing.

And I don't give a hoot if someone doesn't like EU stuff. Nothing says you have to use them. Having them in the game does not diminish your enjoyment of flying what you like. Not having them does diminish my enjoyment in not having what I'd like to fly.

Real quick the AT ST had open air cockpits. Remember Endor. The AT AT can probably survive vacuum but no propulsion no good angle for attack.

I would like to see The Pulsar Skate. I think a rogue squadron expansion would be fun. I also would like to see the Z95 and a reasonable Tie Defender.

Anyone else kinda wanting to see the TIE "clutch" from the novel I, Jedi? I don't remember what it's actual name was, just the nickname Corran Horn gave it.

why not AT-ATs in space, just give them a shove in the right direction and they work just fine (no guaranties concerning motion sickness for the pilots )

and if necessary there should be always a ship around to tow them.

Definitely more bounty hunter ships

The Outrider

The Virago

Z-95

TIE defender & Avenger

E wing

Uglies and a pirate faction