Is "No attachment" a Inmunity?

Thanks

Masi said:

No. So something like Den of the Wolf that removes "all immunities" doesn't do anything to the "No attachments" status.

It is a keyword, though. So something like King Balon's Host, which removes "all non-immunity keywords" would allow you to put attachments on characters with "No attachments."

Immunity allows a card to ignore the direct effects of something. "No attachments" simply means no one can put attachments on the card. They are very different, even if they both end up looking like "this can't touch that."

Thanks. That is what I supposed, but it´s good to ask just to be sure

Do any immunities exist that are not worded like "immune to"? Is "cannot be killed" an immunity e.g? If so, can you list all immunities that do exist?

mischraum.de said:

No.

mischraum.de said:

No. Immunity allows cards to ignore the effects whenever whatever they are immune to resolves. "Cannot be..." means that as far as that card is concerned, there was never anything to resolve. The end result is pretty much the same, but they are not the same thing.

mischraum.de said:

A card is only has immunity if the word "immune" is used. Never assume that something is "immune," or define it as such, just because something cannot touch it.