Feral VS Feudal VS Death Worlder

By GauntZero, in Game Mechanics

Am I the only one who would like to separate a feral world origin from a feudal world origin ?

For me, feudal portrays an era between medieval chivalry and gunpowder/colonialization age.

Feral is settled before and less "developed".

I would rather melt feral world and death world origin together and give Feudal world their own origin, as a character from a feudal world differs greatly in my eyes.

They represent very different ages and lifestyles (compare people from Iocanthos with Severis Secundus for example).

Feudal could even be a variant of highborn, potentially. I don't like it as part of Feral.

Edited by Tom Cruise

I also thought so. Sometimes Highborn is closer to Feudal than Feral is.

I think they are worthy to get their own slot, as they in a lot of ways portray a former state of imperial society.

Feudal, in DH 1.0, was part of Imperial, which is non-existent in this system.

That should be returned!

Yes, Imperial split into Shrine & Feudal would be very much appreciated (as the former Imperial was quite face-less).

Would like to get my medieval Knight Acolyte:

"You, my dear Sire, are a heretic and a fool !"

Edited by GauntZero