here is what i am thinking.
the saga packs (this thread isnt about them- just thought id point out its not a duplicate thread) will be over the next 3 or so years for sure. over this time we will tread across the length of middle earth.
now heres the problem. we are having cycles during this time, im guessing 3. so how are ffg going to handle this?
what i mean is that the designers have to avoid having a cycle and a saga pack in similar areas close to each other without any crossover (or close to)
-this means that the next cycle after this one will not be eriador as we are going there in the black rider
-it also means it is unlikely to be lothlorien or the great river area as we will be going there also before the cycle is up in saga pack #2 (or close after they are finished)
-we cannt go to moria anyways as we have already been there. same with mirkwood
-i feel it is unlikely we will go to rohan as once the cycle is finished (and hence saga packs 1 and 2) we will be immediatly going there again in saga packs 3 and 4
-it would be fine to go to gondor as we wouldnt be going there until the end saga packs, but we are currently there
- mordor would be anticlimatic given we are ending there in the saga packs
so....where does this leave us? i think this points to use going to somewhere less known in middle earth. i would say harad but i feel this is too close to gondor. i would not say rhun as there is only aruond 1 sentence giving information for the designers to work with. arnor brings us back to eriador. forochel and the north is also too vague i feel
so in short here are the places i feel the saga packs or current packs will mean we wont go to
-mordor (too anticlimatic)
-rohan (will mean we end the cycle going straight there again in saga #3)
-mirkwood (been there)
-moria (been there)
-shire/bree (going there in saga #1 hence some crossover)
-gondor (there now)
-harad (to similar to gondor)
-rhun (too vague
an enigma isnt it?
Edited by richsabre