His ability is very nice, but is he really non-unique? Or is that a mistake?

Biggsy said:

Two things:

1) Not really a rules question. That can only be resolved by using the rules link and sending a direct inquiry to FFG.
2) Cards not out yet. It could be that the actual print run will have the unique flag. (or am I dumb and it's out?)

That being said, I imagine that he is supposed to be unique, but we need clarification from FFG or to see the actual, printed, in-stores card to confirm.

I would say that while mdc is correct, we'd all be interested to know what FFG would say on the matter, so a thread on this isn't necessarily out of place.

The card is out and in its printed form it is non-unique.

I'd like to add that until a new FAQ is released, this card is still technically banned.

doulos2k said:

Yea… I came off as a jerk. <.<

Shocking!!!!

Sorry!

What it´s the new text?

orion_kurnous said:

See this thread

5 cost ally!!

That thread on CardDB is referring to giving him keywords such as "immune to events" etc.

Surely those are not keywords - I thought the keywords were only Renown, Deadly and Stealth and then the house abilities (Vigilant, Stalwart, Ambush, Intimidate, Vengeful and Infamy)

HastAttack said:

They are definitely keywords. The core rules define all the keywords and immunity and "No attachments." are included.

I second Bomb. The full list given page 20 of the Coreset rulebook is:

• Deadly
• Deathbound
• Immunity
• Limited
• No Attachments
• Renown
• Stealth
• Setup
• Ambush
• Infamy
• Intimidate
• Stalwart
• Vengeful
• Vigilant

The rules leaflets from A Tale of Champions forward add:

• Joust
• Melee

What is not included is things like "cannot be killed" and "does not keel to attack".