Which of the 2 combat systems, 3e vs 2e are faster? Which has simpler mechanics? Which is more lethal?
Thx
Which of the 2 combat systems, 3e vs 2e are faster? Which has simpler mechanics? Which is more lethal?
Thx
In my experience and without entering into details of the "why", in real time, combats in both combats systems last for a similar amount of minutes. On the other hand, in game time (rounds) combats in 3rd edition last for less rounds. Both systems have very simple mechanics, but in 3rd edition typically players and GMs have to remember less things due to the action cards beign printed (you can do the same in 2nd though). Finally, regarding lethality, both systems are very lethal, in my experience the 2nd edition combat system is more lethal. But since in 2nd PC have fate points, they can die several times before "really" dying. The combat system in 3rd edition has more shades of grey though, with the critical wounds, fatigue and stress sub-mechanics.
You really found 2e to be more lethal? Perhaps at higher levels. Low levels in 2e no one could hit anything. Most combatants only had a 30-40% chance to even hit. Combat always seemed to take a lot longer in 2e, since there would almost always be several rounds where no one hit anything.
I talk of my experience with both systems. In the 2nd edition characters have actions like all out attack that adds +20% chance to hit and charge which adds 10%. Additionally you have bonus for outnimbering 2 to 1, 3 to 1, also bonuses for attacking from the flank and from behind, multiple attacks…all adds up. May be you had a different experience with the game, I cannot know.
Thanks for the feedback I always appreciate hearing from members of the forum.
WFRP3 has advantages over prior editions:
Anyways, in regards to combat, here are my professional-looking, bulleted points:
jh