Can “Port at Slaver's Bay� lower the cost of neutral attachment by 2?

By Isaacnx, in 2. AGoT Rules Discussion

Is neutral attachment out-of -house attachment? I‘m not sure about this.

Someone said that neutral affiliation is not a house, but I cant find it in FAQ.

Thank you.

Neutral cards have no house affiliation. That also means they are not out of house cards and they don't have an out of house gold penalty.

Therefore, Port at Slaver's Bay does not reduce the cost of neutral attachments.

The core set rule book defines how you are to treat neutral cards. I think many of us go to the FAQ first and forget the core set rules still tell you a lot of these types of rules!

Actually, while it is true that neutral cards are not considered out of house, Port at Slaver's Bay does reduce their cost. You get the reduction by 1 on any neutral or in house attachments, while the reduction by 2 is for out of house attachments.

If, during marshalling, you wish to play a character, location, or attachment that is affiliated with a different House, the gold cost to play that card is increased by 2. This is called the gold penalty, and it is the price that must be paid for playing characters that are not loyal to your House. You pay no gold penalty when playing neutral cards.
I find these in core rule.
Thank you!

J_Roel said:

Actually, while it is true that neutral cards are not considered out of house, Port at Slaver's Bay does reduce their cost. You get the reduction by 1 on any neutral or in house attachments, while the reduction by 2 is for out of house attachments.

Eek. I think I got caught up in his question and didn't read that part of the card before posting.