This is the Real Assault Missiles Thread because most other discussion on this forum about the card has been limited to anecdotes, baseless speculation and whining.

There are thousands of ways unfocused Assault Missiles (AM) can roll against an unfocused/evaded TIE (when treating crits as normal hits and understanding that thousands of combinations have the same numerical value). The number of combinations becomes astronomical when taking to account modifiers and bonuses. Rolling a few physical dice means nothing.

First, lets take a look at how AM rolls without taking into account defense dice:

The top row shows how AM was rolled. 4 is AM with no modifiers. 4t/f is AM with target lock or focus (they are the same when treating crits as hits). 4H is AM being shot from Han Solo and rerolling when the first result is less than 2 hits. Finally, 4Hf is AM being shot by Han with a focus and rerolling when the first result is less than 3 hits/focuses. The left column shows the possible number of hits and the other columns show the respective chances of rolling that number of hits.

This information is somewhat useful but what we really want to know is how AM does against defense dice and more importantly, the chances of landing any sort of hit to trigger AM's splash damage.

For that, I made this chart :

Here, the attacks are in the left column, the defense dice are at the top (e is evade, f is focus), and the numbers in the columns are the chances of landing a hit. Han rerolls his dice when getting less than 2 hits without a focus and less than 3 hits with a focus. These are currently all the combinations except for ones involving other pilots' abilities.

To make it easier to decipher at a glance, here is a graph:

As we can see, focusing greatly improves the chance to hit and shooting into any ship that has focused and/or evaded greatly reduces the chance to hit. Not putting AM on the highest skill pilot might be a good idea. If higher skill pilots can strip away focus and evade tokens, that will greatly increase the chances of a hit.

Is the base attack of Assault Missiles particularly powerful? No, not really. Assault Missiles does less base damage than any other missile or torpedo currently. It isn't even much more powerful than a primary weapon attack especially when taking into account the target lock required.

Is Assault Missiles worth taking against TIE swarms? Definitely. Even if the base attack isn't any more powerful than a primary weapon attack, catching at least 2 other ships in the explosion will more than pay for the cost of the missiles.

Is Assault Missiles worth taking against non-swarm lists? I'm not sure about that. Against Imperials, the chances to hit won't be that great and it may be difficult to line up a decent shot on a group of ships. It would be worth shooting one at a Firespray if there are any other ships nearby. Against the rebels, the base attack is generally much easier to land but they have much more hull and shields, ways of regenerating them, and fewer ships usually. I think I'd rather take concussion missiles or spend the squad points elsewhere.

Yes, but your analysis failed to consider the fact that Assault missiles have broken the game.

magadizer said:

According to the original Assault Missiles Thread, Assault Missiles are going to cause the Apocalypse.

Apocalypse? nah. Probably Ragnarok though.

We'll have the apocalypse, ragnarok, armageddon and the rapture all at the same time with these. They'll be the assapocnarageddonture missiles.

Thanks for the info. Just to double check, I don't think you can reroll with target lock since you had to spend it to use AM in the first place. So, that will make it a little less powerful (which is a good thing).

use deadeye so you fire off the missile with a focus token instead of a target lock, then use the target lock you saved on the results of the AM

Duraham said:

Exactly

ShadowJak said:

dont forget Garven for the second focus token….

as the wording of the card says 'Spend your target lock' so I think this negates the dead eye, card in that dead eye can't be used in conguction with any missile cards. Basicly dead eye is used with beam weapons only.

Torresse said:

I already said "These are currently all the combinations except for ones involving other pilots' abilities.

cockney said:

What you said is wrong and doesn't make any sense.

I haven't been on for a few days and seemed to have missed this "deadeye" ability. Search function sucks…

Can someone link me the thread about it or explain it?

Thx

durek_7 said:

I've never heard anything good about this site's search function.

Deadeye is an unreleased elite upgrade card that allows focus to be used instead of target lock on secondary weapons. The upgrade will only cost 1 point. This is why I have 4t/f in the chart instead of just 4f even though target locks and focuses have the exact same offensive value when treating crits as hits.

This will obviously allow secondary weapons to get target lock rerolls instead of focus icons. There are a few combinations with Garven where it will be possible to use a focus to shoot a missile/torpedo and be able to both target lock and focus at the same time. I worked out one scenario in the Deadeye thread, but it was a lot of set up for a combo that didn't improve damage that much.

ShadowJak said:

Thx

ShadowJak said:

let me explain, the wording of the card says spend target lock, you can target lock for missiles and beam weapons, with the dead eye ability you'd be able to use focus, rather then the target lock to hit with your beam weapons, lasers, ion cannon et al, keeping the target lock on for another turn. Missiles spacificly have to have a target lock which is spent, dead eye would not be of use.

cockney said:

No. Totally Wrong.

There are no "beam" weapons in this game. Only primary and secondary weapons. Deadeye specifically allows "Attack [Target Lock]" to be treated as "Attack [Focus]"

If I'm reading the card correctly, it says every ship within range 1 suffers a hit of damage. This is absolutely overpowered, because everyone knows you absolutely can't circumvent this strategy because of the unwritten law that players can't be so creative as to not have every single one of their ships within range 1 of the target. We don't need to play Math-Wing to figure out that this isn't some kind of Sith Lightning Win-button. Does it hamper the swarm a little? Yes. It still has to hit, it still has to damage and you still have to have something within range 1 of it's target. Ta da! I'm so glad there has been this much ludicrous speculation about a previewed/unreleased strategy when we don't even know what cards are sitting in the Slave 1, Interceptor or A-Wing clamshells.

ShadowJak said:

a beam weapon is any weapon that fires a beam, be that a blaster, laser, ion cannon et al, and where is your evidence that your presumption that deadeye specifically allows attack (taget lock) to be treated as attack (focus)?

CaptainRook said:

No you read it incorrectly.

The card reads:

Attack [Target Lock]: Spend your target lock and discard this card to perform this attack.

If this attack hits, the seventh seal on the Scroll of the Apocalypse will break open causing seven angelic trumpeters to blow their horns which will in turn cue the seven bowl judgments .

ShadowJak said:

This is going to require a serious FAQ.

cockney said:

Seriously? Are you trying to troll?

Don't even answer that because it doesn't matter. You are either trolling or have no understanding of the game at all and are just blathering. Either way, further response from me would be a waste of time.

ShadowJak said:

so you have no evidence?

and I have a better understanding of the game then you it seams

As someone who somehow missed seeing this spoiler: what exactly is the text of this Deadeye upgrade card?

dbmeboy said:

Here is the text:

You may treat the [ATTACK: TARGET LOCK] header as [ATTACK: FOCUS]

When an attack requires you to spend a target lock, you may spend a focus token instead

1 cost

It is an elite pilot upgrade card. It isn't that good because all the ships that can currently use it only have slots for one missile or torpedo. It can make proton torps better because they already have a built in mini-focus/marksman but it doesn't make much of a difference on Concussion Missiles, Cluster Missiles, or Assault Missiles. If they make a secondary weapon that uses target lock but doesn't get discarded, this could end up being pretty good.

Offensively, Target Lock and Focus are the same when treating crits as normal hits which is why I combined them in the chart. The chart is about landing any type of hit to trigger the splash damage of Assault Missiles. It would be possible to pull off some tricks with Garven and Chewbacca to be able to fire the assault missiles with a Target Lock AND Focus, but the set up for that would be a ton of squad points (more than 70 for Chewbacca, Garven, Assault Missles, and Deadeye before taking into account any other pilots or upgrades). Making the chart was tedious enough as it is so I didn't bother with that possibility.

The person I'm no longer responding to in this thread seems to think Ion Cannons require target locks to use or something. He obviously isn't reading the cards or is trying to troll. Either way, it isn't worth responding to him until he starts reading the cards or stops trolling so he can make well informed, worthwhile posts.