Bruno's Champ Design Card Leaked

By GoTLove?, in 1. AGoT General Discussion

So I was talking to Bruno after he defeated Butzlaff in the joust final. I was, you know, probing him for info about what kind of card he thought he would design. I'd like to plan for all my future decks to include it. Anyway… My tenacity paid off because he recently sent me this concept.

ra2jo2.png

I like it. But, it should be just Targ, or just Targ and Martell. There are too many houses on it right now.

GoTLove? said:

So I was talking to Bruno after he defeated Butzlaff in the joust final. I was, you know, probing him.

I like to be probed!

Tinygrimes told me Bruno wanted to make a Dickon Manwoody card. I'm still hoping he makes Podrick Payne.

If I recall it was something like:

Dirty Maester

Kneel all lady cards in play to end this phase.

This was after Damon told him flat out that he could not make a Hayden card.

But… that card was too powerful, so I think its going to be

Soft Bottom

Location

Soft Bottom is always knelt.

Not sure about the point behind the card, but I assume there is a reason.

Can we get the text on the card, For some reason, I cant see the photo.

Keggy said:

Tinygrimes told me Bruno wanted to make a Dickon Manwoody card. I'm still hoping he makes Podrick Payne.

I vote for Podrick Payne!

erockbaratheon said:

Can we get the text on the card, For some reason, I cant see the photo.

It's this , but with the title Southern Cavalry Flank , and every house affiliation except Stark.

I still think a Bran Stark card that reads "Bran Stark cannot stand" would be hilarious.

Probably because I'm immature.

MeatLoafX said:

I still think a Bran Stark card that reads "Bran Stark cannot stand" would be hilarious.

Probably because I'm immature.

I know someone had an idea that there should be a Bran Attachment - Attached character gains +2 STR and an INT Icon. If attached character is Hodor, Hodor loses the ally trait and can now attack.

dcdennis said:

MeatLoafX said:

I still think a Bran Stark card that reads "Bran Stark cannot stand" would be hilarious.

Probably because I'm immature.

I know someone had an idea that there should be a Bran Attachment - Attached character gains +2 STR and an INT Icon. If attached character is Hodor, Hodor loses the ally trait and can now attack.

That… would be… amazing.

Also, I'm still the only one who keeps hoping a Champion designs a Mad King card, huh? :( I just want my crazy Targaryen King already.

DubiousYak said:

Keggy said:

Tinygrimes told me Bruno wanted to make a Dickon Manwoody card. I'm still hoping he makes Podrick Payne.

I vote for Podrick Payne!

You'd think that after 10 years he'd have at least 1 card.

Keggy said:

DubiousYak said:

Keggy said:

Tinygrimes told me Bruno wanted to make a Dickon Manwoody card. I'm still hoping he makes Podrick Payne.

I vote for Podrick Payne!

You'd think that after 10 years he'd have at least 1 card.

There has been one Podrick, way back in A Song of Twilight.

http://www.agotcards.org/card/v/2743

We need Podrick. Is he the most significant character not yet in the LCG card pool? Maybe some House Arryn people.

Now that's funny.

dcdennis said:

I know someone had an idea that there should be a Bran Attachment - Attached character gains +2 STR and an INT Icon. If attached character is Hodor, Hodor loses the ally trait and can now attack.

Too bad the only Hodor we have can't have attachments…

Skowza said:

dcdennis said:

I know someone had an idea that there should be a Bran Attachment - Attached character gains +2 STR and an INT Icon. If attached character is Hodor, Hodor loses the ally trait and can now attack.

Too bad the only Hodor we have can't have attachments…

Change the text of the Bran attachment:

"Attached character gains +2 STR and an INT Icon.

If Hodor is in play, this attachment ignores/bypasses the "No attachments." text on Hodor. Remove the Ally trait from Hodor. Hodor can now attack."

Simple fix, really.

Yeah the Mad King would be amazing! Who wouldn't want to be burning some people alive?!

Also, the Bran card could just be a unique event called "Let's go Hodor" that reads -

Action : Treat Hodor's text box as though it were blank, then attach Let's Go Hodor to Hodor as a Condition attachment. Hodor gets +2 Str and gains Stealth.

Done.

widowmaker93 said:

Yeah the Mad King would be amazing! Who wouldn't want to be burning some people alive?!

Also, the Bran card could just be a unique event called "Let's go Hodor" that reads -

Action : Treat Hodor's text box as though it were blank, then attach Let's Go Hodor to Hodor as a Condition attachment. Hodor gets +2 Str and gains Stealth.

Done.

But that still qualifies as an "Attachment". So it wouldn't work.

Best bet would be just to release a new version of Hodor designed around the Bran attachment, a new Summer, a new Meera and a new Jojen. Let them all work somewhat in-sync with each other while also having abilities that interact well with other cards too.

And the likelihood that anyone would consider using a new version of Meera in their deck as opposed to the current one is?….somewhere around the odds of Christina Hendricks finally returning my phonecalls? :-P

I second (third?) the motion for a Mad King champion card.

Rogue Cypher said:

widowmaker93 said:

Yeah the Mad King would be amazing! Who wouldn't want to be burning some people alive?!

Also, the Bran card could just be a unique event called "Let's go Hodor" that reads -

Action : Treat Hodor's text box as though it were blank, then attach Let's Go Hodor to Hodor as a Condition attachment. Hodor gets +2 Str and gains Stealth.

Done.

But that still qualifies as an "Attachment". So it wouldn't work.

Best bet would be just to release a new version of Hodor designed around the Bran attachment, a new Summer, a new Meera and a new Jojen. Let them all work somewhat in-sync with each other while also having abilities that interact well with other cards too.

oh, yeah I wasn't think about that since his text box would be blank. I would have to add that to the attachment effect as well though to make it last more than one phase.

WHy not,

Bran Stark

Cost: 3

Lord

STR 1. P

Bran Stark comes into play knelt. Bran Stark does not stand during the standing phase.

Challenges: Choose and kneel a character (other than Bran Stark) to have it participate in a challenge as the defender.

Challenges: Choose and stand a character (other than Bran Stark) to have it participate in a challenge as an attacker.

While the cost may be off, personally I would love a card like this… granted if I were somehow awarded a chance to design a card, it would be a shadow crest version of Shadow Play. I loved that card back in Winter Block.

I just submitted my card to FFG:

All I can tell you is that it is a Lannister character - Ros the ***** corazon.gif lengua.gif Wait until you see what she does!

mathlete said:

I just submitted my card to FFG:

All I can tell you is that it is a Lannister character - Ros the ***** corazon.gif lengua.gif Wait until you see what she does!

Can she only be triggered while kneeling? gui%C3%B1o.gif gran_risa.gif