Blood Runs True

By dragoku, in UFS Rules Q & A

So i've had this problem for a while cause i never actually read anything about it myself. So in our area we still run BRT as:

1. R Commit:

2. My Opponent Reveals top card

3. -x to next check

4. both players draw one card

5. check is made

so is that really how its still going? Cause in my head the "If/Then" ruling changes the way this card is played. IN the fact that the revealed card is checked and then if the player chooses to fail both players draw a card.

this was in fact covered previously. The "if rule" only applies to abilities that start with "if". Otherwise the "if" only applies to that statement.

dragoku said:

So i've had this problem for a while cause i never actually read anything about it myself. So in our area we still run BRT as:

1. R Commit:

2. My Opponent Reveals top card

3. -x to next check

4. both players draw one card

5. check is made

so is that really how its still going? Cause in my head the "If/Then" ruling changes the way this card is played. IN the fact that the revealed card is checked and then if the player chooses to fail both players draw a card.

BRT just should be banned

Bigphillystyle said:

dragoku said:

So i've had this problem for a while cause i never actually read anything about it myself. So in our area we still run BRT as:

1. R Commit:

2. My Opponent Reveals top card

3. -x to next check

4. both players draw one card

5. check is made

so is that really how its still going? Cause in my head the "If/Then" ruling changes the way this card is played. IN the fact that the revealed card is checked and then if the player chooses to fail both players draw a card.

BRT just should be banned

You know, nevermind that the card isn't deserving of a ban at all.

But this kind of discussion has NO place on Q&A. there was a rules question and it was answered.

sorry, inside joke, kinda