Graver said:
I would agree, only the hardest of hard-liners would want an honest to goodness arbiter as just being an acolyte will more then likely toss him into situations where he'll have to turn a blind eye to transgressions against the Imperial Law if not require him to break it time and time again.
You definatly don't want to play a hardliner all the time. Its one of the reasons that playing a Sister can be so difficult. They're by the way their written totally unflexible in their beliefs, and you have to find creative ways to reign them in. A hardline Arbitator can be just as bad. If the Law says you can't shoot the Planetary Govenor without a trial, and yet your party discovers he's an arch-heretic, a hardliner will want to arrest him, even if your Inquisitor ordered his death. So complete hardliners are a bad thing to an Inquisitor.
An inquisitor looks for flexibility, not extremes. How exactly flexible you have to be is determined by where the Inquisitor falls on the Puritan/Radical scale.