I'm not new to FFG products, but I am new to following a release as I have been since they announced they had the SW licence last year. While my focus has been more on the LCG than the miniatures game, I will say that the PR aspect of the company is just dreadfully shocking. In a bad way. The LCG was slated for release in Q4 of 2011, as I think initially was X-Wing, and it was two months after that release date before they let us know that actually the LCG has been put back into development. X-Wing has certainly seen more love, if that's any consolation, but even that has been quite embarassing. This doesn't seem to be their general way of doing things though, as from in-passing it seems the Netrunner LCG has been released on schedule and is doing magnificently, which makes me wonder if they have their own internal priorities.
But nor is it exclusive to their Star Wars games. The Lord of the Rings LCG has been beset by problems from the outset, and I think it was one of the early Dwarrowdelf adventure packs that had been released and was in general circulation about 10 days before they even announced its release on the site. Other packs have been similarly malsupported earlier this year, but continued calls for hiring marketing people seem to be paying off as things appear to be calming down now, from what I can tell.
I don't think WotC are exactly the saints in this, though. For easily the last eight months of their time with the licence, possibly more, they seemed to have just zoned out from the fanbase and were churning out all sorts of sub-par stuff, and not one staff member was active in their forums for this time, if not longer. So it's not just FFG who ignore their own forums, but then FFG forums come with the tagline "share your hobby with the rest of the players", not "with the company", so can we really expect them to be here, and get upset when they don't respond to forum messages? For rules questions, I've had very good responses in the past by email, usually within a day or two, so I can't complain there. As Budgernaut says, you have to approach the company on their own terms, not how you think they should be.
I also don't think approaching LFL will accomplish anything, either. Unless it is stipulated in the licence agreement "you will produce x games a year, and will provide specific release dates and stick to them or so help you", then I think all they care about will be the sales. And if the sales from GenCon, not to mention the talk from here and BGG from folks who have preordered by the dozen, are anything to go by, then LFL will no doubt be very happy with FFG's performance and will be happy to let the licence rest with the company. At the end of the day, all George Lucas wants to do is make more money, and SW fans have, for years, been complaining how he isn't listening to the fans, and how he has done his own thing anyway, etc, so maybe LFL and FFG are the perfect bedfellows, both with equal disregard for the opinions of the fans…
But on a more serious note, I've learned to basically wait for FFG to produce the game I'm after without taking any account of release date estimates. Their games are generally top-notch when they arrive, and I won't be so proud to say "I'm not going to buy this game because the company got the release date wrong" - I'm more concerned with how enjoyable the game is once I get it. Living in Britain, we have to wait even longer anyway, so release date estimates frequently mean nothing to us. It can take anywhere from four days (Return to Mirkwood) to four weeks (still waiting for A Harsh Mistress) for stuff to arrive over here. I'm happy with what I get, so I've learned to just sit back and wait for it to arrive.