House divided rule clarification

By SerArthurDayne, in 2. AGoT Rules Discussion

Just a quick rule clarification for a few cards.

1. For a House Divided, lets say your opponent has two Maesters in play and its his marshalling phase, he plays a third maester character into play. If I had two copies of a House Divided in my hand could I play both of them to trigger off the response of that maester coming into play and put two maesters on top of his deck ?

2. Lets say, I win a intrigue challenge and I have two copies of "condemned by the council" in my hand, can I play both of these off one intrigue challenge win to discard two locations ?

3. Same scenario as in #2, however I have two"terminal schemes", can I kill two characters off one intrigue challenge win by 4 or more str ?

Thanks!

SerArthurDayne said:

Just a quick rule clarification for a few cards.

1. For a House Divided, lets say your opponent has two Maesters in play and its his marshalling phase, he plays a third maester character into play. If I had two copies of a House Divided in my hand could I play both of them to trigger off the response of that maester coming into play and put two maesters on top of his deck ?

2. Lets say, I win a intrigue challenge and I have two copies of "condemned by the council" in my hand, can I play both of these off one intrigue challenge win to discard two locations ?

3. Same scenario as in #2, however I have two"terminal schemes", can I kill two characters off one intrigue challenge win by 4 or more str ?

Thanks!

Generally speaking, unless a response effect says "limit X per phase," then there is no limit, so long as you have multiple instances of the response.

To clarify that, you are allowed to use each individual Response exactly one time for a single Response opportunity (like winning a challenge, etc.). However, two cards with the same title are still considered two separate, individual Responses - so you can use the Response on each individual CARD one time each.

So what about this situation then, opponent has one Maester in play, I have two a house divided in my hand. He marshalls a Maester and I return that one plus the one already in play to the top of his deck then correct ?

SerArthurDayne said:

So what about this situation then, opponent has one Maester in play, I have two a house divided in my hand. He marshalls a Maester and I return that one plus the one already in play to the top of his deck then correct ?