Seems like you might want to read the FAQ. A whole bunch of your questions are basic timing and game definitions that are covered in that documents.
mbm said:
mbm said:
mbm said:
Ultimately, a lot of that was the same question asked for different cards.
And a lot of it was general timing and definitions and are answered in the FAQ (which can be found here). You really are going to want to check that out.
Contrary to the title of your post, there is nothing to debate in any of those questions.
ktom said:
Ultimately, a lot of that was the same question asked for different cards.
And a lot of it was general timing and definitions and are answered in the FAQ (which can be found here). You really are going to want to check that out.
Contrary to the title of your post, there is nothing to debate in any of those questions.
Thank you for your help - 9/10 helpful.
However, your attitude is really lame - 4/10.
I actually have read some of the FAQ but decided that i am not 100% sure, so i wanted to ask some experienced players.
Excuse me for playing this game for only 2-3 weeks.
ktom said:
Ultimately, a lot of that was the same question asked for different cards.
And a lot of it was general timing and definitions and are answered in the FAQ (which can be found here). You really are going to want to check that out.
Contrary to the title of your post, there is nothing to debate in any of those questions.
Im part of mbm's gaming group, and these were some legitimate questions raised in our sessions.
By people who… dare I say it… are new to the game! And card games in general.
Mostly people wanting to be 100% sure about specific incidents, and how cheese-prone are the official rules.
Thus looking for the highest place of authority we could think of, this forum.
Note that, most of these could have been a simple yes/no answer.
I'd must say your pompous attitude is a major part of what makes getting new people involved in card/board games hard.
Tbh i'd rather risk playing the game wrong then deal with people like you.
Next time if you want to answer a question, try skipping the "let me point out, in details, why your question is extremely stupid" intro.
At the risk of sounding childish, I will quote the legendary Scott Nicholsson in saying; "You are a poo-poo head".
He is the go to source for rules clarification, as anyone who's been around here for more than a week can attest to, but I agree that there is sometimes a certain arrogance (no offence, seriously, I respect your superior knowledge
) in his responses (usually only when the answers are really obvious to someone who has thoroughly read the rules book and the FAQ, as I would recommend doing if you want a solid understanding of the rules). However, the answers he gave were quite detailed, and he was explaining the reasoning and rules behind each answer, so that no more questions would arise around the same rules (as a number of the questions were the same rules with different examples - saving via duplicates, blanking text, etc.), so you should thank him for his help regardless, imo.
J_Roel said:
He is the go to source for rules clarification, as anyone who's been around here for more than a week can attest to, but I agree that there is sometimes a certain arrogance (no offence, seriously, I respect your superior knowledge
) in his responses (usually only when the answers are really obvious to someone who has thoroughly read the rules book and the FAQ, as I would recommend doing if you want a solid understanding of the rules). However, the answers he gave were quite detailed, and he was explaining the reasoning and rules behind each answer, so that no more questions would arise around the same rules (as a number of the questions were the same rules with different examples - saving via duplicates, blanking text, etc.), so you should thank him for his help regardless, imo.
True, therefore i did open my comment with a big 9/10 thank you ![]()
mbm said:
True, therefore i did open my comment with a big 9/10 thank you ![]()
Yes, but your friend (the one I replied to) didn't. Just saying.
Ran said:
I'd must say your pompous attitude is a major part of what makes getting new people involved in card/board games hard.
Tbh i'd rather risk playing the game wrong then deal with people like you.
I stand by what I said. Furthermore if he is the spokesman for the games rules, I am sure he put off more people he potentially helped.
Sometimes the best answers are not yes and no. The best answers are sometimes those with more detail so that you can understand the reason as it will help you learn more about how the game works in similar situations with similar cards.
When ktom asks "Why would you think it works this way?" it is because he wants to understand your line of thinking better so that he can help you understand the card(or cards that work similarly) even better.
Try not to read too much into what can be perceived as a negative tone put into rules answers on this forum. It really is not intentionally negative or condescending. I can tell you that ktom's intentions are all but to put any new players down and he only wants to help you learn the game like he has with many of us in the past. Try to take his answers in with that in mind. :-)
Welcome to the game!
mbm said:
However, your attitude is really lame - 4/10.
That said, I would ask you to consider things from my point of view before you throw too many stones my way (or resort to name-calling as your friend has):
I agree I could have tried harder to be more understanding in my response. And the form of the question put me at a disadvantage in that regard. I'm sorry for the part I played in the miscommunication.
mbm said:
So again, I apologize for the tone. The boards in general could benefit from people spending a little bit of time thinking where the other person is coming from. I am certainly guilty of adding to the problem.
ktom said:
So again, I apologize for the tone. The boards in general could benefit from people spending a little bit of time thinking where the other person is coming from. I am certainly guilty of adding to the problem.
Well… maybe I should also apologize for my tone. Maybe i did read too much into your answers.
This is one of the things I love about this board.
So we sometimes get irritated with each other? Sure.
Do people sometimes make statements that can come off as condescending or rude? Sure.
What happens what this occurs? Someone says "Hey, you're being mean!" and 8 times out of 10, the result is an apology, and a resolution from both parties to try to be more patient and understanding.
In an Internet where rudeness, insult, shock-behavior, racist comments, and inflammatory statements are the order of the day, this board maintains a very high standard of politeness, helpfulness, understanding, and tolerance.
We are awesome.
Let me summarize that most of my questions were answered in detail, and i will surely read the FAQ more carefully.
I have more questions (since i added some new decks as well), but i will try to solve them myself first, using the knowledge you bestowed in this topic, and using the FAQ of course.
Next time there won't be repetitive questions, and i'll try to phrase them better!
Thank you again for the time invested answering.
mbm
This thread made my day! 