You guys don't seriously think that they are going to get that involved and that in depth with regards to all of the different timelines do you? That is extremely unlikely. Different lines of cards for different timelines and different eras seems so convoluted and unnecessary.

Doc9 said:

I don't think that's relevant. This topic is about the inclusion of era symbols in the first place, and we are discussing any and all possibilities related to them. Whether FFG will employ this option and, if so, to what extent they will do so is for them to decide.

As for the "all of the different timelines" comment, I don't know how familiar you are with the EU's publishing system and I don't want to assume unfamiliarity, but just for clarity's sake I'll mention here that there is but a single symbol representing these alternate timelines, and that is the Infinities symbol. There are no specific symbols for each diverging arc, as your post appears to suggest. And for my part, I would agree that using such symbols if they did exist would present far too much convolution for what is supposed to be a simple, "use or ignore" supplementary mechanic.

I haven't been to starwars.com for years, and believe it has gone really quite useless lately anyway, but years ago it was my homepage, and one of the best sections of the website, for me, was the databank. Anyone remember that? It was awesome, kinda like the Essential Guide to Characters but with colour pictures and it would be updated on an almost-regular basis. Anyway, the point to this seeming non-sequiteur is that, in one of its previous incarnations, the databank used era symbols to denote where the character was most prominent, so Vader had the Empire symbol (which was used for the Galactic Civil War) and Thrawn had the New Republic symbol, etc etc etc.

Now, this inclusion was not difficult to understand, intrusive, or confusing, or anything really. It was just there. If you knew what it meant, then it was really handy. If you didn't, you could very easily overlook it and still get something out of the experience of the databank. So I think it entirely possible that such a thing would be included IF the card game strays into different eras.

But yeah, just to clarify Marth's point, we're not talking different timelines, we're talking different chunks of one long timeline. I doubt very much that, IF the card game does go down the route of using different eras, the infinities stories would see anything major. Remember all the fuss made when WotC released a "Leia Skywalker" miniature? So presenting stuff like Leia the Imperial Officer (from Infinities: A New Hope) or something is just not going to happen, I would say.

Even if it does just stick to Rebels vs Empire (which, for a Living Card Game, just seems silly, as I've been saying all along) having different era symbols for the folks around the Galactic Civil War and for those in the New Republic eras would be good. So you don't go mixing Brakiss and Kueller with Bail Organa and Palpatine. Or whoever.

Hm, something else has just occurred to me immediately after I pressed publish, and I think it's worth a mention.

The LotR card game has got a Hobbit expansion upcoming, for anyone who doesn't know. And for those who don't know, there are expected to be certain folks in this expansion who die during the course of that book, so couldn't enjoy adventures with other folks from later in the Tolkien timeline. So I wonder if there will be specific rules or - dare I say a "hobbit symbol" - that precludes mixing of these cards in with the regular deck if you want to keep it a wholly thematic experience? It'll be interesting to see how much of LotR will inform the SW game, should we ever get the SW card game…

spalanzani said:

We will get the SW card game! Now is no time to doubt that!

(Post-Gencon announcement mebbe?)

MarthWMaster said:

Haha! Well, hopefully so!