How many of each house has won a regional? Has each house won at least 1?
Which were the biggest regionals in the US. I know KingdomCon was 32 and Kublacon was 30. Any bigger in the states?
Any other stats, including agendas and restricted cards would be nice as well, but I am specifically looking for the tourney winners if possible.
I think every house has won a least 1 regional. I also think that the maester path has won tournaments out of at least 4 different houses. Nothing official, just going from memory.
I know that Days had 51 players for the joust.
nyc = 23/gj
dc = 27/stark
I created a spreadsheet with the information I could find on the forums. Not all of the information is there (I haven't looked back to find all of it), but it's a relatively accurate breakdown of joust champion house/agenda combos.
I apologize if I got any information wrong, please feel free to fix it.
Regionals Joust Results by House
That makes things easier for me, thanks. I was having trouble deciding what to play in pasadena. Targ and Lannister have only 1 win each so I will likely play one of those.
As for agenda. Do I play an underused agenda? Or do I play maesters to try and accelerate their restriction? hmmm.
Fieras said:
That makes things easier for me, thanks. I was having trouble deciding what to play in pasadena. Targ and Lannister have only 1 win each so I will likely play one of those.
As for agenda. Do I play an underused agenda? Or do I play maesters to try and accelerate their restriction? hmmm.
real men play reinforcements.
dcdennis said:
Fieras said:
That makes things easier for me, thanks. I was having trouble deciding what to play in pasadena. Targ and Lannister have only 1 win each so I will likely play one of those.
As for agenda. Do I play an underused agenda? Or do I play maesters to try and accelerate their restriction? hmmm.
real men play reinforcements.
Neutral Faction doesn't have a win… just sayin'.
I feel like I'm in the twilight zone. Stark is in the lead, with Bara tied for second? What are we coming to? Is the US turning into a European meta?
Honestly I feel like some of the better players are starting to get bored with the same thing(martell) all the time so they turn to other houses. It would be the same result in Europe right now if the better players turn away from Stark/Greyjoy I think. I have felt all the long that the houses while not completely balanced have skewed win loss ratio's based on the skill level of the players. Besides in all honesty, I think the real item that pulls the stats back to where i believed they would be is the number of wins with the maester agenda.
SirDuck said:
Honestly I feel like some of the better players are starting to get bored with the same thing(martell) all the time so they turn to other houses. It would be the same result in Europe right now if the better players turn away from Stark/Greyjoy I think. I have felt all the long that the houses while not completely balanced have skewed win loss ratio's based on the skill level of the players. Besides in all honesty, I think the real item that pulls the stats back to where i believed they would be is the number of wins with the maester agenda.
I don't think its specifically that people have become bored with the houses; I think some houses have just gotten stronger. Bara and Targ especially! Stark got some good new cards too. I feel like every house (except lannister to some extent, who I think is the weakest of the 6) has the ability to be competitive right now, which was not the case this time last year.
I've mentioned this before but I generally refuse to play whatever is commonly considered to be a strong deck at that given time. I derive way more fun beating people with 'lesser' builds
