The kinetic fields would only protect against stubbers, bolts and other solid projectiles. The ME universe completely lacks energy weapons which is probably the point where it and 40K are most incompatible. So las and plasma weapons would just ignore the "shields" of an ME guy. On the other hand ME ubiquitously applies anti-grav tech to literally everything down to the most mundane **** whereas in 40k anti-grav is one of the most misunderstood artifacts of the dark age of technology frequently produced in small quantities for limited applications but totally mythical in it's function.
With 40k vs ME you're talking about rules that are so divergent they don't allow for each other, it's like the old Star Wars vs Star Trek arguments but even dumber.
Well, Geth use plasma weaponry, and it gets stopped by kinetic barriers just fine - probably because plasma is "physical" as well, and the barrier does not discriminate between molecules in the form of a solid projectile or a cloud of gas, being interested only in the speed they impact the shield.
Lasers are more tricky - barriers do not protect against radiation, which leads me to believe that the only thing possibly stopping a las blast would be the armour, whose properties we know very little about.
All in all, the last segment of your post sums it up nicely. Debates such as these are useless simply because there is very little true common ground between the two settings. It's already nigh-impossible to relate these universes to our real world because they use fictional materials with made-up properties instead of hard contemporary science - removing the modern reality from the equation and letting fictional rules compete with fictional rules is a recipe for disaster, and the only thing that can result from it is a shouting match between opposing personal opinions and interpretations.
Hell, 40k does not even have a real canon as far as these details are concerned, and - thanks to generous artistic license - does not know itself what kind of damage weapon X can actually do to target Y. Under these premises, how can we possibly compare it to something else .. when we don't even know what "it" actually is?
Edited by Lynata