I'm a bit confused by Table 1-6 in Battlefleet Koronus. With craftsmanship adding to component SP cost and thus giving you a larger penalty to the aquisition by reducing it's availability, does this mean it doesn't give the usual penalty for improved craftsmanship or does it penalize the Aquisition twice?
Example: Best Craftsmanship Sunsea Laser Battery is a 3 sp component, does this give it a
a) -50 Aquisition modifier (-20 for Very Rare from being 3 SP and -30 for being a weapon component)
or
b) -80 Aquisition modifier (-20 for Very Rare from being 3 SP and -30 for being a weapon component and -30 for being Best Craftsmanship)
Both are IMO problematic as a) results in there being no difference between Best Craftsmanship or Common Craftsmanship when aquisitioning a 1 or 2 SP Archeotech component, while b) makes aquiring Best Craftsmanship anything more or less impossible as it gives a -50 to the Aquisition.
Mostly I'm confused as to why table 1-6 was needed at all, it would have been much easier to just check the availability for the component with common craftsmanship and then add the usual craftsmanship modifier to that like it says you should do in the core book (which would in this example result in a -60 modifier).