I realize that this is a highly subjective question, but in the opinion of you GMs out there, is the Haarlock Legacy or the Apostasy Gambit better?
(Think I know the answer beforehand...)
Also, has anyone led their group through the entire Gambit yet? In that case, how did you, and the players like it?
Basically I can't decide which of the trilogies I want to run (I own all the books except for the Chaos Commandment). In my head, the Haarlock Legacy seems great (though with a lot of extra work for me), the Gambit seems easier to run, and can also be started at a lower rank. (As I said somewhere else, I'll be leading a new group of 4 (experienced) players, starting on rank 1. (With Edge of Darkness, thanks for pointing that one out Gregorius). So that's really the issue here - after EoD, I could probably start off the Black Sepulchre right away, whereas it might be a little too early for Dead Cities, without too much tweaking.
Or is it?
Thoughts and comments welcome.