jack merridew said:
one of my friends played lightbringer as giving the character vigilant instead of the attachment itself for. . . .about a year
Oh dang, I'm still doing this wrong.
Most common rule-breaking "forgets"
A friend of mine, who shall remain unnamed here, dropped Wintertime Reserves left and right at a certain not entirely insignificant tourney at a certain castle last November, and it was not until round 5 of the Swiss that one of his opponents pointed out the Winter requirement to him.
jack merridew said:
played taste for blood wrong on ellaria sand incorrectly for weeks her text states "After you lose a challenge, move 1 power from any character to Ellaria Sand" and taste for blood states "After you lose a challenge as the defender, attached character claims 1 power" but i would put 1 or 2 on ellaria sand and just attack with 1 str and claim 2 or 3 power every challenege i lost. . . .. . still feel bad about that one
one of my friends played lightbringer as giving the character vigilant instead of the attachment itself for. . . .about a year
This happens all the time. The person who plays Taste for Blood simply forgets and gets overexcited about losing a challenge in general and forgets it must be as the defender.
For some reason the attachment having Vigilant is an incredibly common mistake but how would it be worded differently? :-)
Arokasi said:
jack merridew said:
one of my friends played lightbringer as giving the character vigilant instead of the attachment itself for. . . .about a year
Oh dang, I'm still doing this wrong.
HAHAHAHA, I've never looked very hard at this card as I've only played Baratheon once. However, the next time I face off against my buddy he is going to be quiet surprised that I now know the exact text of Lightbringer. I even pulled out my copy after reading this just to verify this. Can't wait to burst his bubble when he pops it onto Robert and tries to Renown me to death.
I always try and use killed the wrong dwarf on nobles.
StarDuster said:
Arokasi said:
jack merridew said:
one of my friends played lightbringer as giving the character vigilant instead of the attachment itself for. . . .about a year
Oh dang, I'm still doing this wrong.
HAHAHAHA, I've never looked very hard at this card as I've only played Baratheon once. However, the next time I face off against my buddy he is going to be quiet surprised that I now know the exact text of Lightbringer. I even pulled out my copy after reading this just to verify this. Can't wait to burst his bubble when he pops it onto Robert and tries to Renown me to death.
Lightbringer would be so broken if it gave vigilant to the character it was on. I for one would play it more.