Playing the introduction game, i've noticed a few encounter cards that remove an attachment that "I control". Can I use these cards to remove a condition attachment like Cought in a Web, or do I not count as "controlling" enemy attachments?

Thank you,

Adam

you do not control enemy attatchments, to get rid of caught in a web you need a card like miner of the iron hills

faq

(1.06) Control of Non-objective Encounter Cards
Players do not gain control of encounter cards unless
control of the card is explicitly granted by a card
effect. When an encounter card (such as Caught in a
Web, CORE 86) becomes an attachment and attaches
to a character, that character’s controller does not gain
control of the attachment.

Captain Poe said:

no, a condition is a seprate "state" than a attachment.

but use these cards to your own advantage. For example moving steward of gondor about your heroes. It is only 2 to cast, and in most multi-sphere decks you end with a ton of resources on a single card. So just discard and place on a new her from the other copy in your hand or the multitude of ways to pull a attachment form your graveyard.

I find that the discard attachment treacheries to in fact be a boon and are in fact integral to some strategies for efficient quest completion with some decks.

richsabre is giving the correct explanation.

booored said:

Further, examples for card states in this game are in play and out of play. In some places in the rules Exhausted is also mentioned as a card's state.

This may sound nitpicky, but applying game terms correctly is key to understand the rather complex rules of this game.

w/e same thing... keep getting my terms mixed up between games.. but yeah,the point is an attachment and a condition attachment are diffrent.