Elena questions.

By Gummy Bear, in UFS Rules Q & A

Posted at

Is it just me, or does the SF09 Elena only have two resource symbols?

Also, I think her last enhance is a HUGE missprint, because the ability requires her to have three resource symbols for the ability, when she only has two.

E: Discard 1 momentum: Your attack gains a keyword (your choice) that it does not already have (except throw). If the keyword requires a rating, that rating is 1. Only playable if your attack shares at least three symbols with your character.

Also, for my last question, you'll notice above, that the enhance says " if the keyword requires a rating, that rating is 1." How is it possible to give a keyword such as powerful, when keywords such as powerful aren't just keywords, they're keyword abilities?

Posted at

Gummy Bear said:

Is it just me, or does the SF09 Elena only have two resource symbols?

Also, I think her last enhance is a HUGE missprint, because the ability requires her to have three resource symbols for the ability, when she only has two.

E: Discard 1 momentum: Your attack gains a keyword (your choice) that it does not already have (except throw). If the keyword requires a rating, that rating is 1. Only playable if your attack shares at least three symbols with your character.

Also, for my last question, you'll notice above, that the enhance says " if the keyword requires a rating, that rating is 1." How is it possible to give a keyword such as powerful, when keywords such as powerful aren't just keywords, they're keyword abilities?

1) it's not you. she has two [funny!]

2) did you even look into her support? she has an action that gives her another resource. and the AoP's (remember them?) all give a resource.

3) there's nothing wrong with the way it's worded. you can give an attack punch if you wished. but if you give it stun or multiple, it will be stun: 1, etc.

Posted at

GouHadou said:

Gummy Bear said:

Is it just me, or does the SF09 Elena only have two resource symbols?

Also, I think her last enhance is a HUGE missprint, because the ability requires her to have three resource symbols for the ability, when she only has two.

E: Discard 1 momentum: Your attack gains a keyword (your choice) that it does not already have (except throw). If the keyword requires a rating, that rating is 1. Only playable if your attack shares at least three symbols with your character.

Also, for my last question, you'll notice above, that the enhance says " if the keyword requires a rating, that rating is 1." How is it possible to give a keyword such as powerful, when keywords such as powerful aren't just keywords, they're keyword abilities?

1) it's not you. she has two [funny!]

2) did you even look into her support? she has an action that gives her another resource. and the AoP's (remember them?) all give a resource.

3) there's nothing wrong with the way it's worded. you can give an attack punch if you wished. but if you give it stun or multiple, it will be stun: 1, etc.

I haven't had time to look at all the Elena support, but I find it kind of irritating that they make you add extra cards to your deck, just so you can add a third symbol to her and play her last enhance. I think I officially hate the new Elena character card.

Posted at

you hate a character that:

is an aggressive 7/20
makes all the attacks she plays +1speed & +2damage
can play bitter rivals

all that without needing to even use her THIRD ability (think about how many characters even HAVE that many abilities, let alone 2)
and if you do meet the requirements, your attack gets speed, damage, AND a keyword?

/thread

Posted at

Don't play Elena

???????

Profit!

Posted at

so you hate having to make your deck around your character?

Posted at

mastermajora said:

so you hate having to make your deck around your character?

That's not what I said. I said, I hated Elena and hew third enhance. Just because I don't like one character card, doesn't mean I don't like all of them. By the way, Q & A isn't the place for thoughtless assumptions.

Posted at

Gummy Bear said:

By the way, Q & A isn't the place for thoughtless assumptions.

oh? pot meet kettle:

Gummy Bear said:

Is it just me, or does the SF09 Elena only have two resource symbols?

Also, I think her last enhance is a HUGE missprint, because the ability requires her to have three resource symbols for the ability, when she only has two.


Gummy Bear said:

I haven't had time to look at all the Elena support, but I find it kind of irritating that they make you add extra cards to your deck, just so you can add a third symbol to her and play her last enhance. I think I officially hate the new Elena character card.



/THREAD

Posted at

GouHadou said:

Gummy Bear said:

By the way, Q & A isn't the place for thoughtless assumptions.

oh? pot meet kettle:

Gummy Bear said:

Is it just me, or does the SF09 Elena only have two resource symbols?

Also, I think her last enhance is a HUGE missprint, because the ability requires her to have three resource symbols for the ability, when she only has two.


Gummy Bear said:

I haven't had time to look at all the Elena support, but I find it kind of irritating that they make you add extra cards to your deck, just so you can add a third symbol to her and play her last enhance. I think I officially hate the new Elena character card.



once more, with FEELING - /THREAD

Can't be the end of the thread if you keep crawling back to it. -/THREAD... no wait, huh, what?

Posted at

...

you do realize that i'm the official rules arbiter and it's MY JOB to keep up these threads, along with Tag' and 'goth.
ironic you can't even follow your own advice about where commentary belongs.

*wishes posts could be deleted to remove clutter*

Posted at

GouHadou said:

...

you do realize that i'm the official rules arbiter and it's MY JOB to keep up these threads, along with Tag' and 'goth.
ironic you can't even follow your own advice about where commentary belongs.

*wishes posts could be deleted to remove clutter*

Well, I was done with this thread until you decided to quote everything I'd said thus far and respond to it with ignorant sarcasm. I only respond to what's said to me.