Hi,

I have a question about the interaction between:

Blind Loyalty: E commit: your opponents attack is unblockable. after their attack deals damage, you may play a reversal from your hand as though their attack was blocked. If that reversal deals damage, add it from your card pool to your hand

and:

Magic Shop: E: if your opponent's attack deals damage, you may play an attack AS A reversal as if you had blocked their attack.

That being said, would these effects allow for 2 attacks to be played after the attack deals damage. or would i have to choose to play either a reversal or another attack as a reversal?

You would have to choose which to do, but you cannot play two reversals here.

Cronos said:

*STAMP*

Note that in either case, the attack has to be a reversal in the first place.

magic shop doesnt specifiy the attack has to be a reversal. is that still the case? One would think that was it to be reversal only it would not have the "attack as a reversal" line included

Lasombraknight said:

No. But it says you may play an attack as a reversal. Which means as a R eact to blocking an opponents attack. There are 2 requirements to playing a reversal, 1, the trigger (blocking an attack) needs to happen, and 2, the attack needs to have the reversal keyword.

magic shop eliminates the first condition. Some cards let you play a card "as if it had the reversal keyword", which eliminates the 2nd condtion. If you used Sak or something to give an attack the reversal keyword, you still need to block. If you use magic shop, the reversal still needs the reversal keyword.

The key text on Magic Shop is "as if they had blocked the attack", which indicates it's looking for an attack that could already be played as a reversal. It's just removing the first condition that the attack has to be blocked.

This was covered multiple times previously, but that was on the old boards.