I saw on the errata that the inquisitor's Handbook had a few mistakes in it (less than the mainbook), and it said they would be corrected by the 2nd printing. I was curious on when that might be and if the misprints were so bad it effected the overall content of the book to prevent it from being worth getting. Any opinions would be greatly appreciated.

Also, is there any problems with the Disciples of the Dark Gods? I just got it and I wanted to make sure everything was good with it too. Thanks!

Nothing wrong with the inquisitor's handbook, imo. The misprintings are barely noticeable unless you're the kind of person who calculates population densities for hiveworlds.....

Don't know about disciples of the dark gods, I haven't picked up my hard copy yet, though I plan to when I get gaming money again. I've flipped through an electronic copy of it, though, and it looks pretty solid. Very much a book for GM's, I would say though.

I own a first-print (black-library published0 version of the INq's handbook. Its okay for the most part. the mistakes are irritating but are more than made up for

the disciples of the dark Gods is great, but don't EVER let your players read it.

MysteriousGrey said:

Kind of hard to do considering some of us players buy the books. And to be honest there's always something players can use in the books they publish, be it some new item, talent, background, power, skill use etc.

Solardream said:

But a good player knows the difference between player knowledge and character knowledge.

As for the IHB, if you dont have it, I dont care what version, get it. It is invaluable.

Oh certinally, metagaming is right annoying.

But I read things anyways. Unlike the Imperium knowledge is not as proscribed as it is here for the people. Just won't use it in in character knowledge.

True, but the surprise at the end is always better if they genuinely don't know.

Has a new printing of the core with the errata included being released?