We have scenario 6 of Seelow next week where the defender starts in a huge building and the attacker has twice the points to kill 'em all. What points do you think it would be fair for the attacker? If the attacker has to many points then he may not kill all in 8 turns and if he has to little then it will be a quick, boring game, any suggestions?

The last time I played it was 200pts for the attacker. Was a quite narrow victory for the attacker though, cause I've only taken infantry with me (defender).

But kept all the funny stuff like apes and Z's at home. Too much cost intensive.

I think double the points is fair. It is an assault. Who assaults a defensive position without superiority?

Grand Inquisitor Fulminarex said:

True, but that wasn't the question or problem I was asking how many points the attacker should have to give a good game, we've now opted for 250pts.