~Ben, you should really tell us again how you feel about Melee-only cards in chapter packs. Come on, don't be shy, hold nothing back!
Dabbler?
Ratatoskr said:
~Ben, you should really tell us again how you feel about Melee-only cards in chapter packs. Come on, don't be shy, hold nothing back!
~That might take some time and maybe my own blog. Just stay tuned to it.
Ratatoskr said:
~Ben, you should really tell us again how you feel about Melee-only cards in chapter packs. Come on, don't be shy, hold nothing back!
Old Ben said:
~That might take some time and maybe my own blog.
~Oh, I would totally read that. Once. Maybe.
Ratatoskr said:
~Ben, you should really tell us again how you feel about Melee-only cards in chapter packs. Come on, don't be shy, hold nothing back!
OMG please stop, you're making me laughing to death!
Old Ben said:
berto said:
I've done as well with Agotcards according to recommendation I got from one of leading person:
Andrzej Kozlowski I'm getting sick with this login problem. I use four different computers and every 2nd time I have issue getting access to this site. It's getting annoying
Gualdo .change site
I think recommendation is clear you have issue with our site change it. OK no problemo I will support from now cardgamedb.com.
I want to take part in that, as being one of the people which are annoyed by these several "bugs, that are either no bugs or just intentional design choices" posts. And honestly i was really glad to find the announcement that you would now "prefer" another website, cause it spares me the time to scroll up or down on some themes that have been written and or discussed daily.
It´s not like it´s a bad thing to try to take part in the design of a website or making suggestions, but repeating the stuff all over again in the common section (dashboard) is in fact really annoying.
~Yes, i realized people will now catch me up on the "black border- and / or melee thing", but i still think it´s different if you offer a free service or a long time service for which you get paid. ;-)
Thank you ben.
I want to point out that all of those annoying bugs will be, soon or later, be solved once and for all. Nobody is saying "it's a bug, what a shame I won't do anything about it", of course
interestingly, Dabbler has been semi-updated. Has names of all the Oldtown chapter packs. Hopefully text to follow.
Mighty Jim said:
interestingly, Dabbler has been semi-updated. Has names of all the Oldtown chapter packs. Hopefully text to follow.
Wow! FAQ update and Dabbler update! This is the best day ever!
I am not going to discuss further about this. I only want to clarify one issue with pm between us.
sixpounder said:
I won't report here what we said each other via PM because I respect your privacy, but I'd like to point out that all these complains started only AFTER those PMs, so I see kinda of a link between those PMs and your complaints. Wich, let me point this out, we said more than once must be written on the blog in order to avoid spamming the dashboard for players who are there fro browsing cards and stuff and who don't give a **** about bugs and sort of.
{Sixpounder}
I asked in mentioned pm that I would like to buy site template software to build site for another TCG. 6pounder replies that he does not want sell this soft. (I don't put here a reason respecting his privacy)
In second mail I told him that I'm developer too and I'm willing to help with site development. It was not my idea 6 pounder asked people for help. It was as well refused.
That's all. Thinking that this conversation changed my opinion about site is ridiculous. I repeated a lot of times here and there than site is very nice developed. All my criticism was only to make this site better.
berto said:
I am not going to discuss further about this. I only want to clarify one issue with pm between us.
sixpounder said:
I won't report here what we said each other via PM because I respect your privacy, but I'd like to point out that all these complains started only AFTER those PMs, so I see kinda of a link between those PMs and your complaints. Wich, let me point this out, we said more than once must be written on the blog in order to avoid spamming the dashboard for players who are there fro browsing cards and stuff and who don't give a **** about bugs and sort of.
{Sixpounder}
I asked in mentioned pm that I would like to buy site template software to build site for another TCG. 6pounder replies that he does not want sell this soft. (I don't put here a reason respecting his privacy)
In second mail I told him that I'm developer too and I'm willing to help with site development. It was not my idea 6 pounder asked people for help. It was as well refused.
That's all. Thinking that this conversation changed my opinion about site is ridiculous. I repeated a lot of times here and there than site is very nice developed. All my criticism was only to make this site better.
I'll point out the reason here, there's nothing top secret: I just CAN'T give away the code because I used some part of it for other projects that I cannot disclose to third party. That's all. And I'm not saying that there MUST be a link between this things, I say that your "communication method" that someone else already described as... let's say insistent, could lead people to wrong conclusions and some sort of suspect. As I already said, words are stone. Nothing more than this.