His!

I have a basic question about Tactics Cards:

How many Tactics cards can you play on your Turn?

a) 1
b) As many as you want (& are able to)
c) Something else (I'm unaware of)

Thanks!

L

I don't remember reading a rule about this, so my guess is as many as you want.

Yup, there is no limit, as long as each card is eligible to be played (because of the "timing" listed on the card, and you didn't just recieve it that same season).

You can even play two copies of the same card during the same turn if you want. For instance, two Battle Cry at the end of a battle to get a net +2 for each standing unit, or two Summon Lightnings to REALLY hurt your opponent before battle.

The one exception is Pillage; Corey has ruled that you cannot play two Pillage cards after the same battle.

Hi!

This is what Mr K answered back:

"You may play as many tactics cards as you want each turn as long as:
1) You do not play a tactics card that you acquired during this season
2) You do not play more than one copy of the same card

"I hope this answers your question!
-Corey Konieczka
VP of R&D
Fantasy Flight Games"

I guess I can add this to my document, just in case anyone else has the same question

Although I may follow up on the 'more than one copy of the same card', as that's news to me; nothing in the rules prohibits this. (And in fact contradicts an earlier ruling that specifically ALLOWED you to play multiple copies of the same card, although the Pillage card was later specifically exempted from this allowance).

HI):

So Corey contradicted his contradiction!

L

LETE said:

The original ruling didn't contradict anything; there's nothing in the rules that says you can only play one copy of a card at a time.

HI:

dude, chill - t'was only a joke!

L

LETE said:

dude, chill - t'was only a joke!

I wasn't upset, just confused

Hi:

Was my comment

a) a confusing contradiction

b) a contradictory confusion

c) just plain contradictory

d) just plain confusing

or

e) all the above?

L

I'm not sure what you are asking.

My post above was referring to "he contradicted his contradiction", which means that the first ruling he made was a contradiction, and that the second ruling contradicted THAT ruling. So saying "he contradicted his contradiction" was not really accurate; he contradicted his original ruling, but the original ruling did not contradict anything at the time. IE - the only contradiction is between the two rulings themselves, and specifically that the later ruling is contradicting the first.

I hope that makes sense. Maybe I'm misunderstanding what it is you are asking though.

Hiyas!

So, another of my jokes goes down in flames. Yet I won't give up: Practice practice practice makes perfect!!!

L

LETE said:

It's not you, it's probably me I've got a very bad "joke detector" on the internet