Question about the history of Targ

By rwjohnson, in 1. AGoT General Discussion

For the record I also agree. I was just saying that Daario was a good card, well costed, and if he was bumped up one STR with out a suitable increase in cost or a drop in some other stats he would be crazy. As to whether he fills a hole Targaryen needs filled is not something I'm trying to argue. I agree he really doesn't at this point.

Now you give me a 3 STR version of him at the same cost, maybe swapping out a different keyword or a different ability, and then I say Targ is getting some love.

Stag Lord said:

plus he hits mercenaries too - which actually increases his taregt base agaisnt Targaryen.

He actually hits Knights and Traitors, not Mercenaries, which makes him not that great imo.

Alando said:

Stag Lord said:

plus he hits mercenaries too - which actually increases his taregt base agaisnt Targaryen.

He actually hits Knights and Traitors, not Mercenaries, which makes him not that great imo.

Yeah especially since it's passive and Jorah is a Targ staple.