Sebashaw said:
I think it's pretty clear. It is about surrendering one's body and soul to service Him - and Him alone.
Taking a lover would mean the same as if your love was not reserved for the Emperor. Engaging in carnal pleasures without love on the other hand is clearly breaking the core idea of "penitence, hardship and deprivation".
Considering the extreme variances of dogma within the Ecclesiarchy, I think it's safe to say that, depending on the region, some of the clergy may have wives, husbands or concubines - yet from all we have ever heard of the Sisterhood with its unified doctrine, traced back to the "no males allowed" shrine of San Leor (Orleans...), I really, really, really do not see any room to turn them into temple whores.
Just my two Thrones on the subject, accompanied by the respective fluff quotes leading to this stance. FFG's Sororitas already differ slightly from the ones by GW, so I guess you'd be free to modify them further if you think it makes for a better game for your group.
the 8 spider said:
Not really.
"These Sisters become outcasts seeking death in the heat of battle, yet at the same time are revered by their Sisters who see them as pilgrims seeking that which can only be found in death - absolution."
- Codex : Witch Hunters
Absolution = death. The Oath of Repentence basically makes the Sister taking the vow a "walking dead". For all accounts and purposes, for her fellow Sisters she now numbers amongst the Order's casualties even though she still lives. This is also nicely depicted in the novel Faith & Fire - a good read for anyone seeking inspiration considering the Sisterhood.
