The New Updated FAQ : more an Errata than a FAQ...

By willmanx, in Warhammer Fantasy Roleplay

Nobody may repeat someone's words with his own. In my case (first post), I don't speak about anger. I speak about major errors coming just after having spend more than 150 bucks to get "clarified and expanded" material (I bought the 3 guides and creature's vault)

It is a lot of money for a lot of mistakes and I am very disappointed compared to the high level quality I was used to with the whole WFRP3 line (and FFG in general) and compared to what requires professional standings.

I wrote and published some rpg stuffs in France and know a lot about these mistakes, spellngs and re-reading. You can't be 100% but you have to be more than these products. This is a failure to me, and I wanted to express that.

That said, I'm a huge fan, I bought every WFPR3 products and still will buy the next. Guides and Vaults were a failure, but together Warhammer 3 will stand :)

Well...i dont care too much about errors in guides..because i've always stayed far away from that crap... but certanly

1. i dont want to see stupid errata in my FAQ document!! please make the errata avaible on a separate pdf!!!

2. the cards component could not be simply errated! we need an easly printable pdf document for ALL of them...not just the missin ones!!!

What pissed me most is a kind of disrespect in front of paying customers: i've buyed GM vault only to found that some informations about creature's ability are missing!! what dead ernest do? what are swarm vulnerabilities?? if u had customer's respect u should had

A. write on the back-cover: YOU NEED TO BUY CREATURE GUIDE TO FULLY USE THIS PRODUCT!

OR

B. stop wasting leaflet space marketing the creature guide and give a fkg proper summary of ALL the creature's ability!