Profile of del Toro in The New Yorker.

By Avi_dreader, in Arkham Horror Second Edition

Haven't read it yet, so I'm not going to that link then.

I'll get to reading it when I get to reading it. Right now I've started The Dunwich Horror again.

By the way—today is Wilbur Whateley's birthday!

He's 98 today!

Tibs said:

By the way—today is Wilbur Whateley's birthday!

He's 98 today!

Just make sure the candles on the cake are CANDLES. You never can tell with the Whateley boys.

Tibs said:

Haven't read it yet, so I'm not going to that link then.

I'll get to reading it when I get to reading it. Right now I've started The Dunwich Horror again.

By the way—today is Wilbur Whateley's birthday!

He's 98 today!

We should hold an eldritch birthday party for him. gran_risa.gif

Ill bring the goat cheesepartido_risa.gif

It's a really impressive article; took me more than an hour to read and by the end of it, i felt an anxiety like if i was back to childhood and it was chrismas eve...if Del Toro can't create a Lovecraft adaptation on film, i don't know who could.

satanito said:

It's a really impressive article; took me more than an hour to read and by the end of it, i felt an anxiety like if i was back to childhood and it was chrismas eve...if Del Toro can't create a Lovecraft adaptation on film, i don't know who could.

I'll say two things... If he doesn't do it, I'll be disappointed, and if he does it but screws it up, I'll be even more disappointed :'/ I haven't been exactly crazy about all of his work, although he hasn't done anything visually that I haven't enjoyed... I have a gnawing worry that he'll keep the plot and imagery and dump almost everything else... Sure... It'll still be a horror movie, but I want it to be as faithful to Lovecraft as possible (which includes retaining as much Lovecraftian language as would be possible without alienating a movie audience)... I've been nervous about him since Hellboy 2... Although I did love that scene with the elemental :'D

Well, he did smack the corporate writers when they said there had to be a love story in it somewhere...So that's something, at least!

Anyone notice the date on this article is Feb 7 2011? I'm reading the future!

Nah, that's just the New Yorkers style. So up-tight, we're from the FUTURE! Or...something...