TheProfessor said:
I think there is a parsing problem in your reading of the sentence (or else you were being humorous and I missed it!).
He was disqualified for having a deck that took to long to shuffle. That deck won 90% of the time.
This. Grammar fail on my part. I apologize. It won by having a card that said "If there are 200 or more cards in your deck during your upkeep you win the game." The rest of the deck was card search.
Fotonurth said:
Fotonurth said:
TheProfessor said:
I think there is a parsing problem in your reading of the sentence (or else you were being humorous and I missed it!).
He was disqualified for having a deck that took to long to shuffle. That deck won 90% of the time.
This. Grammar fail on my part. I apologize. It won by having a card that said "If there are 200 or more cards in your deck during your upkeep you win the game." The rest of the deck was card search.
Yeah I remember about the time of Ravnica block being a really stupid deck type. Actually it is still stupid even if effective.
I would like to play fun/thematic games of Cthulhu with larger decks, say highlander for instance. I think we need a deeper card pool first though as it is still a bit shallow. Once we get to the numbers that the CCG had, it should be more feasible.
Cthulhu variants would be fun.
Fotonurth said:
Cthulhu variants would be fun.
I'd love me some slightly less clunky multiplayer.
Cuacuani said:
I'd love me some slightly less clunky multiplayer.
dosexplora.free.fr/telecharger/rules_multiplayers_cenacle.pdf
We tried the Cenacle rules for a couple of weeks, but the gang decided they didn't improve the flow or speed of the game. Some clever ideas, but for us locally, not our cup of tea.