About Eddard Stark (king's landing)
No. Eddard says that he can only use his ability when a Noble character is chosen as the only target of an effect. The rules are pretty specific (as is Eddard's own ability) that before something is considered a "target" of an effect, the word "choose" must be used in the effect. Only effects that say "choose a character" (and the chosen character has the Noble crest) can be canceled by Eddard.
ktom said:
No. Eddard says that he can only use his ability when a Noble character is chosen as the only target of an effect. The rules are pretty specific (as is Eddard's own ability) that before something is considered a "target" of an effect, the word "choose" must be used in the effect. Only effects that say "choose a character" (and the chosen character has the Noble crest) can be canceled by Eddard.
Thank you Ktom.
ktom said:
No. Eddard says that he can only use his ability when a Noble character is chosen as the only target of an effect. The rules are pretty specific (as is Eddard's own ability) that before something is considered a "target" of an effect, the word "choose" must be used in the effect. Only effects that say "choose a character" (and the chosen character has the Noble crest) can be canceled by Eddard.
So does this mean Eddard can't cancel a noble character saving himself with its duplicate?
mischraum.de said:
The "choose" and "target" machanics are a little confusing in this game.
You'd think that for example Risen from the sea chooses a character as a target, but apparently not.
Believeinthis said:
The "choose" and "target" machanics are a little confusing in this game.
If the word "choose" appears, there's a target. Otherwise, there's no target. Easy peasy. Confusing? Don't think so.
eloooooooi said:
The "choose" and "target" machanics are a little confusing in this game.
If the word "choose" appears, there's a target. Otherwise, there's no target. Easy peasy. Confusing? Don't think so.
Any other confusion in the mechanic is based on an assumption that because A acts on B (and perhaps only B), B must be a "target" of A - which isn't even necessarily true from a language point of view.