Dear all,
Has anyone considered implementing the topic's eponymous dichotomy in a Warhammer fantasy setting? Feasible? Enriching?
I'll be restarting my table-top gaming group soon, and I'd like to flesh out a few background witch-hunter characters. As I've been reading through my collected WH40k lore, I noticed there were several ideas easily applicable to the fantasy setting. The divide between Puritans and Radicals is one that I would like to add, but am not entirely sure whether it's a good thing to do.
Pro:
* Makes witch-hunter guys more varied, with more types past the archetypal fire-brand guy.
Con:
* The Old World is not the Galaxy - it is much harder for a Radical to hide their fall from grace. Or?
* I imagine it'd be hard to convincingly implement some of the more blatant radical types. Which ones would work? Which ones would be a straight no?
Istvaanians, Recongregators and Xanthites I find hard to see as doable - unless really toned down (to the point of being indistinguishable from a "regular" default witch hunter who's just causing trouble and sowing fear).
Libricar sound tempting and appear quite easy to transport into Fantasy wholesale. Same goes for Amalthians.
Thorians would be interesting, if a little heretical.
Oblationists also sound interesting, albeit that would ultimately mean a rogue witch-hunter, no longer sanctioned by the Cult of Sigmar.
Thoughts?