Lightbringer said:
Well I guess it depends what you mean by "notable" then. And I know Adam and the Baron will jump up and down about so much weight being put on one word! 
But thinking it through, the British Army consists of many regiments, but how many would you really describe at notable? Ask someone not from Great Britain with a non-military background to name three British regiments, and they might go..."Er...Those guys that guard Buckingham Palace? Er...."
So theoretically if the entire British Army had been summoned to join the Imperial Guard, the only "notable" regiment would be the Coldstream Guards. Because of their lovely furry hats. 
The SAS, The Paras, The Ghurkas, would probably also have instant public recognition. As would arguably the Royal Marines.
That aside, can we have an unbiased (no offence) read thru of where those numbers are mentioned. It seems odd to me to mention a list of battle, then put an abstract number of 'notable regiments' without actually naming them. Just seems pointless. A rough idea of total numbers would have the worth of giving a general idea of the presumably intended VAST 40k style.
Who has the book? Can we get an exact quote from the book, is it indeed saying or implying they've only given numbers for notable regiments?
